Answer:
Option E is correct.
All of the above
Explanation:
This is an example of political risk since The current political party in Maharashtra-Shiv sena intervened and used Enron for its selfish interests. When US department of energy issued a statement that cancelling Enron could endanger other private FDI from USA, the same was again used to further its selfish interests. Finally Maharashtra renegotiated its contract with Enron.
Answer:
Answer is Option 2: Life insurance proceeds received after the death of a spouse.
Explanation:
Life insurance proceeds are generally not taxable. They are paid after insurer's death. It would only be taxable if the policy was given to the spouse for a price. Even if proceeds are paid under accidental policy or health insurance policy, they are not taxable. Proceeds are always paid as a lump sum amount and not in installments.
Other given options, 1, 3 and 4 like reimbursement for medical expenses, taxable portion of a disaster relief payment and dividends exceeding net premiums paid are taxable.
Answer:
Explanation:
Identifying Constraints of Communication Channels Strategically selecting a communication channel means that you choose the communication channel that is best able to meet your work objectives. This process involves evaluating three qualities of communication channels: richness, control, and constraints. Richness involves two considerations: the level of immediacy and number of cues available. Control refers to the degree to which communications can be planned and recorded, thus allowing strategic message development. Constraints refer to the practical limitations of coordination and resources. You will evaluate communication channels in terms of richness, control, and constraints. Roll over each phrase to read a communication task and identify the most serious limitation. Then drag each communication task to the box associated with that limitation. Richness Control Constraints Phone conversation Phone call Team meeting Texting Webinar Break room conversation Video conference Email
Answer:
The Supreme Court decided that the use of prayers to open government meetings in 2014 is constitutional and that such meetings can hold, even if it clearly favors one faith, provided that there is no attempt to harass, intimidate, or coerce other religion believers.
