Answer:
third one
Step-by-step explanation:
can you help me with my question In the extended simile of the underlined passage from Paragraph 15 of "A Wagner Matinee," the narrator makes an observation about the soul that aring rokol been A. it is like a strange moss on a dusty shelf that, with excruciating suffering, can wither and die y for I the be B though after excruciating suffering it may seem to wither, the soul never dies, C. excruciating, interminable suffering that goes on for half a century can kill the soul.
Answer:
The result is the same.
Step-by-step explanation:
I think your question is missed of key information, allow me to add in and hope it will fit the original one.
Please have a look at the attached photo.
My answer:
Given the information:
- square 12 inches wide
- 3-inch diameter cookies are cut => its radius is: 1.5 inches
Hence we can find some information:
- The area of the square is:
square inches - The area of a cookies is:
π = 3.14*
= 7.065 square inches - The total number of 3-inch cookies are: 4*4 =16
=> The total area of the cookies is: 16* 7.065 = 113.04 square inches
=> how much cookie dough is "wasted" when 3-inch cookies are cut:
= The area of the square - The total area of the cookies
= 144 - 113.04 = 30.96 square inches
If the diameter is increased to 4 inches => its radius: 2 inches, we have:
- The area of a cookies is: π =
square inches - The total number of 3-inch cookies are: 3*3 =9
=> The total area of the cookies is: 9* 12.56 = 113.04 square inches
=> how much cookie dough is "wasted" when 4-inch cookies are cut:
= The area of the square - The total area of the cookies
= 144 - 113.04 = 30.96 square inches
The result is the same.
https://www.slader.com/discussion/question/if-a-truck-traveled-248-miles-in-4-hours-then-the-truck-9c45464f/
Answer:
The answer is 829 because you are adding
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Claim 2
Step-by-step explanation:
The Inscribed Angle Theorem* tells you ...
... ∠RPQ = 1/2·∠ROQ
The multiplication property of equality tells you that multiplying both sides of this equation by 2 does not change the equality relationship.
... 2·∠RPQ = ∠ROQ
The symmetric property of equality says you can rearrange this to ...
... ∠ROQ = 2·∠RPQ . . . . the measure of ∠ROQ is twice the measure of ∠RPQ
_____
* You can prove the Inscribed Angle Theorem by drawing diameter POX and considering the relationship of angles XOQ and OPQ. The same consideration should be applied to angles XOR and OPR. In each case, you find the former is twice the latter, so the sum of angles XOR and XOQ will be twice the sum of angles OPR and OPQ. That is, angle ROQ is twice angle RPQ.
You can get to the required relationship by considering the sum of angles in a triangle and the sum of linear angles. As a shortcut, you can use the fact that an external angle is the sum of opposite internal angles of a triangle. Of course, triangles OPQ and OPR are both isosceles.
