Answer:
The function is non-proportional.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the function was proportional, when the number of hours spent riding the bicycle is equal to 0, the total cost of renting the bicycle would also be 0. In other words, the function would be proportional if y=0 when x=0. However, this is not the case.
Plug 0 into the equation as x
When 1 bicycle has been rented for 0 hours, the customer still has to pay 10 dollars just for renting it. When x=0, y=10. This means that the function is non-proportional.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
the null hypothesis would be: p = 70%/0.7
The alternative hypothesis would be: p < 0.7
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is most of the time always the default statement while the alternative hypothesis is tested against the null and is its opposite.
In this case study the null hypothesis would be: the proportion of men who own cats is 70%: p = 0.7
The alternative hypothesis would be: the proportion of men who own cats is smaller than 70% : p < 0.7
Answer:
Cash price
Step-by-step explanation:
The computation is shown below:
The Interest rate per month (r) = (9% ÷ 12) = 0.75%
Now Present value of the monthly payment is
= PMT × {[(1 + rate of interest)^number of years - 1] ÷ rate of interest}
= 1,499 × {[(1 + 0.75%)^12 - 1] ÷ 0.75%}
= 18,748.89
And the cash price is 15,999
So, the cash price would be lower
Answer:
3. the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
because I know
