All categories

3 years ago

What is [5x6] divide by 5+4-3

Mathematics

2 answers:

kotegsom [21]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: 7

Step-by-step explanation:

kondaur [170]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:5

Step-by-step explanation:5x6=30divided by 5+4-3=6 and then 30 divided by 6 equals 5

You might be interested in

Help with this one? Please

netineya [11]

Answer:

x = 40

Step-by-step explanation:

The figure shows two similar triangles. Thus, the side lengths of similar triangles are proportional to each other. Therefore:

$\frac{24}{24 - 15} = \frac{x}{x - 25}$

$\frac{24}{9} = \frac{x}{x - 25}$

Cross multiply

$24(x - 25) = 9(x)$

$24x - 600 = 9x$

Subtract 24x from each side

$- 600 = 9x - 24x$

$- 600 = -15x$

Divide both sides by -15

$40 = x$

x = 40

3 0

3 years ago

A town's employment statistics show that 855 of its residents were unemployed last month. This is a decrease of 25% from the pre

Leona [35]

Decrease of 25% means only 855 people? Okay, so you want to backtrack. If you divide by 25% you’re going to get what it was for a 75% decrease. So divide by .75 instead. 855/.75 = 1140 unemployed residents last month

6 0

1 year ago

Solve using synthetic division.<br><br> (x2 + 3) ÷ (x − 1)

murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

2x+3 / x = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Solve the literal equation for y. 2x-4y=20

Phoenix [80]

2x -4y=20
-4y=-2x+20
Y= 1/2x - 5 that’s the answer

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A random sample of 38 wheel chair users were asked whether they preferred cushion type A or B, and 28 of them preferred type A w

-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

The statement that cushion A is twice as popular as cushion B cannot be verified

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Sample size n=38

Type a size A $X_a=28$

Type a size B $X_b=10$

Generally the probability of choosing cushion A P(a) is mathematically given by

$P(a)=\frac{28}{38}$

$P(a)=0.73$

Generally the equation for A to be twice as popular as B is mathematically given by

$P(b)+2P(b)=3P$

Therefore Hypothesis

$Null H_0: p \leq \frac{2P}{3P} \\Altenative H_A:p>\frac{2P}{3P}$

Generally the equation normal approx of p value is mathematically given by

$z=\frac{x-np_0-0.5}{\sqrt{np_0(1-p_0)} }$

$z=\frac{28-(38*2/3)_0-0.5}{\sqrt{38*2/3*1/3} }$

$z=0.75$

Therefore from distribution table

$Pvalue=1-\theta (0.75)$

$Pvalue=0.227$

Therefore there is no sufficient evidence to disagree with the Null hypothesis $H_0$

Therefore the statement that cushion A is twice as popular as cushion B cannot be verified

7 0

3 years ago