Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act ,ANCSA was generally well-received in Alaska by both Natives and non-Natives. After years of legal wrangling over exactly who was entitled to Native corporation shares, many of those corporations have grown into successful businesses that generate substantial dividends and provide thousands of jobs for Native shareholders.
The exact terms of that agreement would be for the federal government to decide and—after initially offering the Natives far less than they wanted, in terms of land and cash—Congress and President Richard Nixon eventually agreed to a historic deal.
Answer / Explanation:
It is to be noted that the earth can be broken down into three climate zones which are polar, temperate and tropical climate zones. The main mover of a climate zone is the amount and direct sunlight that reaches the Earth's surface. In the tropical regions, there is a fairly constant amount of sunlight throughout the year.
Thus, a zone that is closer to the equator will continuously receive a lot of direct sunlight and such a place will have a warm climate.
<u>Answer:
</u>
With the advent of condensed and evaporated milk in the late 1800s, the percent of mothers that breastfed their babies had come down to 20-30% by 1940.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Though it was deemed crucial to breastfeed the babies during their infant years, majority mothers chose to feed their babies with condensed and evaporated milk owing to various rumors that had disseminated in society.
- These rumors were regarding the sagging of breasts and also about the possibility of breast cancer due to breastfeeding.
- The availability of evaporated and condensed milk just proved to be of convenience for the mothers who did not want to feed their own milk to their babies.
Spring festivals, cherry blossoms, dragon festivals
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
