Answer:
option (C) $3,000
Explanation:
Data provided:
Policy duration = 4 years
Policy amount = $12,000
Date on which premium is paid = January 1, 2013
Date on which entry is adjusted = December 31, 2015
Now,
The time passed between January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015 = 3 years
Therefore,
Amount to be recognized as insurance exp. on December 31, 2015
=
=
= $9,000
Thus,
The balance in the prepaid insurance account = $12,000 - $9,000 = $3,000
Hence,
The correct answer is option (C) $3,000
Answer:
3. No, due to unilateral mistake
Explanation:
Lacey and Cagney both had agreed to wok for 30 hours per week and the agreement is in written format since it is enforceable. Both of them are sharing 50% profits so both will have to share the duties equally. When Lacey makes an excuse and is working for 20 hours per week only Cagney can sues her and she is in a probability to win against her. Lacey should have informed Cagney about the vacation from school scenario before signing the contract.
Answer:
HR Function refers to areas such as recruitment, selection, recruitment and retention, performance evaluation, promotional preparing, and reimbursement managerial staff.
Explanation:
- Throughout traditional HRM every one of these operations has been associated with capacity building and therefore are constrained even within the HR manager. Those other operations are not focused on an organization’s strategy.
- Traditional HRM is therefore not focused on effective organizational culture, while strategy Implementation focuses on its philosophy.
Answer:
Sexual Harassment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question in regards to the situation at hand it can be said that Connie's experiences are best described as Sexual Harassment. This term refers to when another person exhibits inappropriate sexual remarks or behavior towards you in a professional or social situation. Which is what Connie's boss is doing by making inappropriate sexual advances towards here after she explicitly told him to stop.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly
Answer:
Lowa should produce corn; Nebraska should produce Wheat
Explanation:
Two states: Iowa and Nebraska
Same two goods are produced by both of them: Corn and wheat
For lowa,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = 3 bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of wheat
For Nebraska,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = 3 bushels of wheat
According to the concept of comparative advantage, a country is exporting the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage and a country has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity is lower than the other country.
In our case, lowa should producing and exporting corn because the opportunity cost of producing corn is lower than the Nebraska and on the other hand, Nebraska should producing and exporting wheat because the opportunity cost of producing wheat is lower than the lowa.