The fact that people who watch a lot of violent TV are also more likely to be aggressive does not in itself proof a cause-effect relationship. That is, there is no evidence that one situation is a cause and the other one is a consequence (causation). It only proves that both characteristics are present together (correlation).
This could be a case of “spurious correlation,” which implies that two characteristics are often present together because there is a third factor that influences both of them.
For example, if we assume that this case refers to minors, it could be that minors who watch a lot of violent TV are neglected by their parents. Additionally, it could be that children who behave aggressively are also neglected by their parents. If that were the case, then being neglected would be a more likely predictor of violent behaviour, as opposed to watching violent TV.
In order to make sure there is a cause-effect relationship, we would need to perform an experiment where all other factors are controlled.
Answer:
The answer is autonomy.
Explanation:
Both Ryan and Deci were interested in autonomy as a motor for wellness: it made sense for them that people enjoyed doing something in which they could get their best experience and achieve their best performance. In other words, autonomy refers to an internal motivation for doing any given activity. This is, doing something because we want to do it.
Answer:
When she has gained a lot from George riches
Explanation: from the above, Linda is only interested in george's riches because from her statement George is rich and given time ,she may eventually come to love him . her love is dependent on the time and riches of George.
