Answer: It was the first fight of the civil war, and it shows that there WILL be conflict over slavery
Explanation: Bleeding Kansas demonstrated that armed conflict over slavery was unavoidable. Its severity made national headlines, which suggested to the American people that the sectional disputes were unlikely to be resolved without bloodshed, and it therefore acted as a preface to the American Civil War.
Answer:
I believe that the answer is D. China
Answer:
One of the mainly disadvantages of this form of rating, is that they are talking or measuring based on assumptions not science.
Explanation:
Therefore they don't have certainty and if the primary damage from the Tornado is not big, this one could grow and cause major disasters and put people's life in danger, because the main objective of the measurement is to prevent the population.
<h3>For example:</h3>
Let's imagine there's a Tornado that is really small and hasn´t damage anything yet and it's getting close to the town, let's say Mississippi, and it's going to arrive there in 10 minutes but because it hasn't cause damage the autorities decide that they're not going to ask the population to protect but by the time it hits town, the Tornado grew three times it's inicial size because of the wind so houses are destroyed, nature and lives lost because they didn't have the chance to prevent and protect themselves.
Answer:
The answer is b. and c.
Explanation:
With regards to answer b: A persuasive political speech is geared towards presenting an idea to the general population and supporting it with rhetorical argument. The politician uses rhetoric to garner support from the people, so the speaker has to use devices that appeal to the peoples general sentiments. For example, if a country is facing the decision of signing a free trade deal, the president might deliver a speech to persuade the people of the idea that free trade is the key to economic success.
With regards to answer c: the political speech might serve to unite people during a difficult time, such as wartime, and motivate them to act in the best interest of the country. Consider Winston Churchill, who led Britain to prosperity during World War II. He boosted the morale of the British people, and frequently travelled to the battle fronts to show his people that he new how to solve complex war situations and consequently take action. Since he consistently had 78% approval as prime minister, we can argue that his speeches united Britain and made them strive to take the best course of action.
Answer:
The top answer is wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Explanation:
It's poor social skills!!!!!!!!!!!! I took the test!!!!!!!!!!