All categories

2 years ago

Here is the question

Mathematics

1 answer:

artcher [175]2 years ago

5 0

3.17 is the answer and u can’t round to the nearest 10 cause it’s not necessary

You might be interested in

The illustration below shows the graph of y as a function of x.

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

x = 18

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Find the (a) mean, (b) median, (c) mode, and (d) midrange for the data and then (e) answer the given question. Listed below

mafiozo [28]

Answer:

a) $\bar X = 369.62$

b) $Median=175$

c) $Mode =450$

With a frequency of 4

d) $MidR= \frac{Max +Min}{2}= \frac{49+3000}{2}= 1524.5$

e) $s = 621.76$

And we can find the limits without any outliers using two deviations from the mean and we got:

$\bar X+2\sigma = 369.62 +2*621.76 = 1361$

And for this case we have two values above the upper limit so then we can conclude that 1500 and 3000 are potential outliers for this case

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following data set given:

49 70 70 70 75 75 85 95 100 125 150 150 175 184 225 225 275 350 400 450 450 450 450 1500 3000

Part a

The mean can be calculated with this formula:

$\bar X = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n}$

Replacing we got:

$\bar X = 369.62$

Part b

Since the sample size is n =25 we can calculate the median from the dataset ordered on increasing way. And for this case the median would be the value in the 13th position and we got:

$Median=175$

Part c

The mode is the most repeated value in the sample and for this case is:

$Mode =450$

With a frequency of 4

Part d

The midrange for this case is defined as:

$MidR= \frac{Max +Min}{2}= \frac{49+3000}{2}= 1524.5$

Part e

For this case we can calculate the deviation given by:

$s =\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i -\bar X)^2}{n-1}}$

And replacing we got:

$s = 621.76$

And we can find the limits without any outliers using two deviations from the mean and we got:

$\bar X+2\sigma = 369.62 +2*621.76 = 1361$

And for this case we have two values above the upper limit so then we can conclude that 1500 and 3000 are potential outliers for this case

5 0

2 years ago

Can a Scalene triangle be a isosceles triangle? A: Always B: Never C: Sometimes

arsen [322]

A scalene triangle can never be an isosceles triangle. How? Well, let's take a look at the definition of a scalene triangle. In short, a scalene triangle is a classification of a triangle that does not have any congruent sides. On the other hand, an isosceles triangle is a triangle in which its legs are both congruent. Therefore, if a scalene triangle has two congruent legs, it wouldn't even be a scalene triangle, but instead it would be an isosceles triangle. Hope this helped!

3 0

3 years ago

Is this correct???

GaryK [48]

Answer:

There's supposed to be nothing in the 7 and 8 columns

Step-by-step explanation:

You were good, but there aren't any in the 7 or 8 columns, making 9 an outlier.

hope this helps:)

5 0

2 years ago

What is another name for the set of counting numbers

Masteriza [31]

Its is called A positive integer or a natural number.

5 0

3 years ago