"if it is tested in a controlled setting with repeated results" is the statement among the choices given in the question that best describes that can possibly make this scientific claim valid. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope the answer has helped you.<span>
</span>
Answer is: concentration of hydrogenium ions is 9,54·10⁻⁵ M.
c(HNO₂) = 0,075 M.
c(NaNO₂) = 0,035 M.
Ka(HNO₂) = 4,5·10⁻⁵.
This is buffer solution, so use <span>Henderson–Hasselbalch equation:
pH = pKa + log(c(</span>NaNO₂) ÷ c(HNO₂)).
pH = -log(4,5·10⁻⁵) + log(0,035 M ÷ 0,075 M).
pH = 4,35 - 0,33.
pH = 4,02.
<span>[H</span>₃O⁺] = 10∧(-4,02).
<span>[H</span>₃O⁺] = 0,0000954 M = 9,54·10⁻⁵ M.
There are two subshells that are s and p, which are present in the second energy level.
The energy level can be defined as the fixed distances from the nucleus of an atom where electrons may be found. Each energy level is divided into some Subshells. These subshells are known as s-subshell, p-subshell, d-subshell, and f-subshell. This subshell contains some orbitals, these orbitals are the place where there is the maximum probability of getting the electrons. In one orbital, a maximum of two electrons can be present.
Hence, there are two subshells in the second energy level.
Learn more about subshells here:
brainly.com/question/26438203
#SPJ10
Hello!
If the reaction could be made to go faster B. The hill would be shorter.
The "hill" is called Activation Energy. It is the energy of the activated intermediate compound needed to complete the reaction. Catalysts are substances that don't intervene in the reaction which speed up the rate of a given reaction by lowering the Activation Energy giving alternate reaction pathways with lower-energy intermediates. If the reaction could be made to go faster with the use of a catalyst, then the Activation Energy would be lower and the "hill" would be shorter.
Have a nice day!
