All categories

4 years ago

Which of the following is NOT part of the simple circular flow model?

Business

1 answer:

hjlf4 years ago

4 0

Answer:

<u>The correct answer is B. Government</u>

Explanation:

There is no doubt that the simple circular flow model explains supply and demand in an elemental economic perspective, however this model doesn’t take into account at least five other key factors of the economic systems. Those factors are:

1. Government sector.

2. Government spending.

3. The taxation system.

4. The financial institutions.

5. Imports and exports.

<u>The correct answer is B. Government.</u>

You might be interested in

Two investment advisers are comparing performance. Adviser A averaged a 20% return with a portfolio beta of 1.5, and adviser B a

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

Option A is the correct answer.

A. Advisor A was better because he generated a larger alpha.

Explanation:

To determine which adviser would be the better stock selector, we will calculate the required rate of return of each adviser and the return actually averaged. The adviser with the greater abnormal return, which is return in excess of required rate, will be the better stock selector.

Using the CAPM, we can calculate the required rate of return on a stock. This is the minimum return required by the investors to invest in a stock based on its systematic risk, the market's risk premium and the risk free rate.

The formula for required rate of return under CAPM is,

r = rRF + Beta * (rM - rRF)

Where,

rRF is the risk free rate

rM is the market return

r of Adviser A = 0.05 + 1.5 * (0.13 - 0.05)

r of Adviser A = 0.17 or 17%

Abnormal or excess return of Adviser A = 20% - 17% = 3%

r of Adviser B = 0.05 + 1.2 * (0.13 - 0.05)

r of Adviser B = 0.146 or 14.6%

Abnormal or excess return of Adviser B = 15% - 14.6% = 0.4%

Adviser A performed better as the excessive return or alpha of Adviser A was 3% while that of Adviser B was 0.4%

7 0

3 years ago

While figuring out how to save money for a bride who is having financial problems, paula, the catering manager of oh happy day,

Bumek [7]

While figuring out how to save money for a bride who is having financial problems, Paula, the catering manager of Oh Happy Day, asked her assistant, "What do you think is the best menu to offer under these particular circumstances? How can we offer the bride and groom's guests a great meal within their budget?" Paula and her assistant are using the contingency approach.

True

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Petroski Natural Dying Corporation measures its activity in terms of skeins of yarn dyed. Last month, the budgeted level of acti

guapka [62]

Answer:

$577 Unfavorable

Explanation:

The calculation of spending variance for dye costs is shown below:-

Spending variance for dye cost = (Standard rate - Actual variable) × Actual units

= ($0.67 - $13,910 ÷ 19,900) × 19,900

= (0.67 - 0.69899) × 19,900

= $577 Unfavorable

Therefore for computing the spending variance for dye costs we simply applied the above formula.

4 0

4 years ago

Using this table, calculate the profit at each level of running shoe inserts production. Pair 1: $ Pair 2: $ Pair 3: $ Pair 4: $

Aloiza [94]

Based on the total cost, total revenue, and pair of shoes, the profit level at every level of running shoe production are:

Pair 1 - $23
Pair 2 - $51
Par 3 -$80
Pair 4 - $109
Pair 5 - $137

<h3>What are the profits at each level?</h3>

The profit can be found as:

= Total revenue - Total cost

At first level:

= Total revenue - total cost

= 30 - 7

= $23

At pair 2:

= Total revenue - total cost

= 60 - 9

= $51

At pair 3:

= Total revenue - total cost

= 90 - 10

= $80

At pair 4:

= Total revenue - total cost

= 120 - 11

= $109

At pair 5:

= Total revenue - total cost

= 150 - 13

= $137

The total profit is increasing because the total revenue is increasing significantly yet the total cost is only increasing marginally.

In conclusion, the profit is increasing more because cost is increasing less.

Find out more on total profit at brainly.com/question/1078746

#SPJ1

6 0

2 years ago

The Green Fiddle has current liabilities of $28,000, sales of $156,900, and cost of goods sold of $62,400. The current ratio is

olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer: 83.53 days.

Explanation:

We would need to calculate the Current Assets as well as the Quick Assets.

Calculating the Current Assets we can use the Current ratio and Current Liabilities as follows,

Current Assets = Current Ratio * Current Liabilities

= 1.22 * 28,000

= $34,160

Then we calculate the Quick Assets which are essentially the most liquid assets being Cash and Cash Equivalents,

= Quick Ratio * Current Liabilities

= 0.71 * 28,000

= $19,880

Inventory will be Current Assets minus Quick Assets because Current Assets include all Current Assets whereas Quick Assets are Cash And Cash Equivalents Current Assets

= 34,160 - 19,880

= $14,280

We can then calculate the Inventory Turnover as,

= Cost of Goods sold / Inventory

= 62,400/14,280

= 4.36974789916 times.

Now we can finally calculate the days of Inventory by dividing the days in a year by the Turnover ratio. We will assume a 365 year.

= 365/4.36974789916

= 83.53 days.

It takes 83.53 days on average does it take to sell the inventory.

5 0

4 years ago