Its the connection between those numbers
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
Answer:
(2.3 times 10^4) is less than (1.15 times 10^8). That means that every single one of these answer options is wrong. However, If the problem were how many times bigger is 1.15 x 10^8 than 2.3 x 10^4 then the answer would be 5000. So therefore all of these answers are incorrect. I now understand why you are so desperate for this answer!
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: x=8
Step-by-step explanation:
Distribute 5(x) and 5(-2)
-12 + 6x = 6 + 5x + (-10) OR 5x - 10
Flip if you'd like
6x - 12 = 6 + 5x - 10
Combine like terms
6x−12=(5x)+(6+−10)
6x - 12 = 5x - 4
Subtract 5x from both 6 and 5
6x - 5x = 5x - 5x
5x cancels out, so you're left with x, 12, and -4
x - 12 = -4
Add 12 to 12 and -4
12 + 12 = -4 + 12
12 cancels out
-4 + 12 = 8
x = 8
Answer:
57.8
Step-by-step explanation: