1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew11 [14]
3 years ago
14

Who was the first president of UK​

Law
2 answers:
MArishka [77]3 years ago
8 0
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"

I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.

For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.

Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
jasenka [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

There is no president. In the UK here are the King and Queen.

You might be interested in
Angela is a prosecutor who handles mostly murder cases. She believes "The CSI Effect" is real and can be problematic for trying
dlinn [17]

With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,

  1. The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
  2. Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>

Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.

As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.

Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.

Learn more about social discrimination here:

brainly.com/question/13964317

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Court implications on IPV
sweet [91]
The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims.
7 0
3 years ago
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
How much of a threat to democracy and voter participation is gerrymandering
Kitty [74]

Answer:

uuggygy

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
So the Links that I have been telling people NOT TO CLICK ON, I learned some more info! These people send the links wanting you
Mazyrski [523]
Thanks girl! i almost tried clicking on one today!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is there a difference between a capital sentence and a sentence of life without parole?
    14·1 answer
  • Using four or more complete sentences, analyze the importance of the First Amendment in the United States.
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is something prints found on a crime scene must have in order to be of evidentiary value? *
    15·1 answer
  • The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the d
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a true statement? Members of the House of Representatives serve four-year terms. The number of senator
    8·1 answer
  • The rules an agency within the executive branch makes are called:
    6·1 answer
  • Explique a construção de uma teoria relacionando fatos, leis e conceitos em sua resposta.
    5·1 answer
  • A very serious crime that has a maximum possible sentence of more than one year in prison and that may have the death penalty it
    6·1 answer
  • What do you feel causes the most conflict? How can conflict be avoided in the first place?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain what the Corpus Iuris Civilis was and its importance for the development of law.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!