Answer:
Slave laws in the southern colonies in the 1600s "b. defined an enslaved person as someone who could be bought and sold" This rule was set in place to fight against some owners who attempted to set their slaves free prematurely.
Explanation:
Slave laws in the southern colonies in the 1600s defined an enslaved person as someone who could be bought and sold.
Southern laws in America were so harsh on slaves. Let's have in mind that the southern economy depended so much on slaves. That is why southern people were against abolitionism. Slaves had to work long hours in the large southern plantations to produce the kind of crops needed for trade and to export to Europe. Slaves in the south lived difficult lives and were not considered to be persons, but property.
Answer:
Hallucination
Explanation:
Hallucination are defined by the idea that a situation / a scenario exists which in reality does not exists. In extreme situations hallucinations may also lead a person to smell or touch things that do not exist. Hallucinations are mostly caused by mental illnesses or a breakdown of the nervous system.
Answer:
<em>Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model.</em> Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such <em>issues </em>as <u>politics of democratic and authoritarian states</u>, <u>political identit</u>y, <u>regime change</u> and <u>democratization</u>, <u>voting behavior</u> and a number of others.
<em>Comparativists often ask</em> how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.
Following the <u>democratization example</u>, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.
There's no sample answers but i'll list some...
Majority Rule
Voting
Freedom of Religion
Individualism
etc.
Answer:
the idea that if you do something for someone then that person owes you something in return.
Explanation:
