Explanation:
Given the mass of HCl is ---- 0.50 g
The volume of solution is --- 4.0 L
To determine the pH of the resulting solution, follow the below-shown procedure:
1. Calculate the number of moles of HCl given by using the formula:

2. Calculate the molarity of HCl.
3. Calculate pH of the solution using the formula:
![pH=-log[H^+]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=pH%3D-log%5BH%5E%2B%5D)
Since HCl is a strong acid, it undergoes complete ionization when dissolved in water.

Thus, ![[HCl]=[H^+]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BHCl%5D%3D%5BH%5E%2B%5D)
Calculation:
1. Number of moles of HCl given:

2. Concentration of HCl:

3. pH of the solution:
![pH=-log[H^+]\\=-log(0.003425)\\=2.47](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=pH%3D-log%5BH%5E%2B%5D%5C%5C%3D-log%280.003425%29%5C%5C%3D2.47)
Hence, pH of the given solution is 2.47.
The model after John Dalton's was J.J Thompson's plum podding model in 1897, which described electrons as dots or raisins(if you will) in a circle shaped pudding that was entirely positive using a Cathode Ray Tube(shot cathode rays between magnets). The model after that is the Niels Bohr model in 1913, which depicts atoms like positively charged center called the nucleus with negatively charged particles called electrons in a shell or cloud.
Answer:
Scientists seek to eliminate all forms of bias from their research. However, all scientists also make assumptions of a non-empirical nature about topics such as causality, determinism and reductionism when conducting research. Here, we argue that since these 'philosophical biases' cannot be avoided, they need to be debated critically by scientists and philosophers of science.
Explanation:
Scientists are keen to avoid bias of any kind because they threaten scientific ideals such as objectivity, transparency and rationality. The scientific community has made substantial efforts to detect, explicate and critically examine different types of biases (Sackett, 1979; Ioannidis, 2005; Ioannidis, 2018; Macleod et al., 2015). One example of this is the catalogue of all the biases that affect medical evidence compiled by the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University (catalogueofbias.org). Such awareness is commonly seen as a crucial step towards making science objective, transparent and free from bias.
The s orbitals are not symmetrical in shape is a FALSE statement.
An s orbital is so symmetric, more specifically spherically symmetric that it looks the same from all directions.
- The atomic orbitals in the atoms of elements differ in shape.
In essence, the electrons they describe have varying probability distributions around the nucleus. The spherical symmetry of s orbitals is evident in the fact that all orbitals of a given shell in the hydrogen atom have the same energy.
- All s orbitals are spherically symmetrical. Put simply, an electron that occupies an s orbital can be found with the same probability at any orientation (at a distance) from the nucleus.
The s orbitals are therefore represented by a spherical boundary surface which is a surface which captures a high proportion of the electron density.
Read more:
brainly.com/question/5087295
1. A soluble salt can be prepared by reacting an acid with a suitable insoluble reactant including:
a metal
a metal oxide
a carbonate
3. I don’t know this one
4. A term base or glossary is a database containing single words or expressions related to a specific subject.
5. Strong acid is an acid that ionizes completely in aqueous solution. It always loses a proton (H+) when dissolved in water. Weak acid is an acid that ionizes partially in a solution. ... Because the rate of reaction depends upon the degree of dissociation αand strong acids have higher degrees of dissociation.
im not sure of the rest