Answer:
an avoidance-avoidance
Explanation:
Avoidance-avoidance conflict: The term"avoidance-avoidance conflict" refers to the tendency of an individual to make a particular decision by choosing between two equally or similar undesirable choices.
Example of avoidance-avoidance conflict: A boy encountering avoidance-avoidance conflict would be involved in the procedure of choosing between one of the two tasks i.e, either to do his school assignment or to do any household work.
In the question above, the statement signifies the avoidance-avoidance conflict.
Answer:
the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost
Explanation:
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>
In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.
"T
Any word ending with the suffix -cide means to kill or death. Suicide specifically means to kill oneself. This is usually done because they believe their life has gotten to the point where there are no better alternatives and death is the only way to release some sort of pain or bad situation."
Answer:
65
Explanation:
An autosomal dominant condition is one where one copy of the allele is sufficient to cause the condition. Penetrance refers to the degree to which that mutation causes the phenotype
Lets say the allele for sharp beak is S and for normal beak is s. If 2 heterozygous sharp-beaked terrapins mate, the cross is the following:
Ss x Ss
<u> S s </u>
S SS Ss
s Ss ss
The possible genotypes are SS, Ss and ss. 50% of their offspring will be heterozygous, and 25% homozygous each. Therefore, if the mutation was fully penetrant, it would be 75 out of 100 offspring would be affected.
However, the mutation is only 87% penetrant, which means only 87% of those 75 offspring would have the condition.
87% of 75 = 65.25
Therefore, we would expect 65 of their offspring to have sharp beaks
