Answer:
His return on investment is negative 8.7%
Explanation:
Thomas purchased 2,500 shares of EKK at $54 per share (=$135,000 / 2,500).
He received $750 (= $0.30 x 2,500) in annual dividends.
He sold his 2,500 shares at $49 per share = $122,500
The total amount of money he received from his investment is $122,500 + $7
50 = $123,250, then we divide that by $135,000 = 0.913 - 1 = -8.7%
The fact that the HR department only asked the opinion of the top executives and not the other employees on the creation of an on-site childcare made Manuela and Noor feel that procedural justice was not being served.
<h3 /><h3>What is Procedural justice?</h3>
It corresponds to the idea of equity over the administration of legal procedures for resources in a given situation, such as in the organizational environment.
Therefore, equity is a relevant characteristic for the employees of an organization, who compare their inputs and outputs with those of other co-workers, thus generating a sense of justice about the processes.
Find out more about Equity theory here:
brainly.com/question/12717673
<span>The contractual standard for product safety and liability that says the buyer chose to make the purchases and knows the each purchase involves informed consent is often referred to as the standard of caveat emptor. This is simply a warning that lets the buyer know and understand the product is sold as is and is subject to all defects. Basically, another way of saying buyer be ware.</span>
Question: The question is incomplete. See the full question below and the answer.
You are an up-and-coming developer in downtown Seattle and are interested in constructing a building on a site you own. You have collected four bids from prospective contractors. The bids include both a cost ($millions) and time to completion (months):
Contractor Cost Time
A 100 20
B 80 25
C 79 28
D 82 26
The problem now is to decide which contractor to choose. B has indicated that for another $20 million, he could do the job in 18 months, and you have said that you would be indifferent between that bid and the original proposal. In talking with C, you have indicated that you would just as soon pay her an extra $million if she could get the job done in 26 months. Who gets the job? Explain your reasoning. (It may be convenient to plot the four alternatives on a graph.)
Answer:
See the explanation for the answer and find attached of the graph.
Explanation:
So we draw a regression line of Time vs Cost and best fit a curve based on the data given, given in the above figure. The four alternatives are marked in the figure as well. Our main objective is to reduce both time and cost, but that might not be possible So the best thing would be to look for alternatives which lie below the line. If C gets an extra million, then that point would come below the regression line, and it would be a better alternative than D, because for the same time we are getting the job done at a cheaper cost.
Also if B is paid extra 20 million, that point also comes below the regression line, and hence will be a better alternative than A because for the same cost again we are getting the job done earlier. We need to choose between B and C. Now in order to optimise both cost and time, we need to choose a point close to the middle point of the regression line segment in 1st quadrant. We see that C is much more closer to the middle point and hence seems like a better option.
So we choose C as our contractor if we consider B's alternative bid, but if we do not consider B's alternative bid and stick to the original one, we choose B as our contractor.
Explanation:
The internet has revolutionized the relationship between companies and consumers. Currently, the majority of the population has a cell phone that impacted communication and accessibility. Therefore, companies had to adapt and build new strategies for prospecting and retaining customers through insertion in social media, using active relationship marketing that seeks to engage and generate value for their potential audience through social media, in addition to selling online. to make the experience easier for the consumer.
The online presence of companies is able to offer significant advantages to the consumer, such as a greater discount on products offered online, since companies pass on the reduction of fixed costs with a physical store to the prices offered in an online environment.