All categories

2 years ago

When a bank keeps $12 from a $100 deposit as legal reserves, it is using

1 answer:

6 0

When a bank keeps $12 from a $100 deposit as legal reserves, it is using <span>a fractional reserve system. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "b".

</span>The Fed has defined different categories of money, M1 and M2, according to the money's function. The correct option among all the options <span>that are given in the question is option "b".</span>

You might be interested in

The following is information for Palmer Co. Year 3 Year 2 Year 1 Cost of goods sold $ 643,825 $ 426,650 $ 391,300 Ending invento

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

Inventory turnover

Year 3 6.95 times

Year 2 4.73 times

Year 1 4.23 times

Days Sales In Inventory

Year 3 55.22 days

Year 2 75.07 days

Year 1 86.28 days

Explanation:

Inventory turnover is the ratio that how many time a business has sold or replaced the inventory during a given period. A business is considered more profitable if it has high inventory turnover.

According to given data

Year 3 Year 2 Year 1

Merchandise inventory 97,400 87,750 92,500

Cost of goods sold $643,825 $426,650 $391,300

Inventory turnover = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory value

Inventory turnover= Cost of Goods Sold / [ ( Opening Inventory + Closing Inventory ) / 2 ]

Year 3

Inventory Turnover = $643,825 / [ ( 97400 + 87750 ) / 2 ] = 6.95

Year 2

Inventory Turnover = $426,650 / [ ( 87750 + 92500 ) / 2 ] = 4.73

Year 1

Inventory Turnover = $391,300 / 92500 = 4.23

As there will be no Beginning inventory so average inventory will be same as the closing inventory is the same as the Closing Inventory.

Days Sales In Inventory = 365 x Ending Inventory / Cost of Goods Sold

Year 3

Days Sales In Inventory = 365 x 97,400 / $643,825 = 55.22 days

Year 2

Days Sales In Inventory = 365 x 87,750 / $426,650 = 75.07 days

Year 1

Days Sales In Inventory = 365 x 92,500 / $391,300 = 86.28 days

3 0

3 years ago

A private investment club has $300,000 earmarked for investment in stocks. To arrive at an acceptable overall level of risk, the

Alexeev081 [22]

Answer:

Investment in low risk=$150,000

Investment in medium risk =$30,000

Investment in high risk=$120,000

Explanation:

✓We can denote the investment in high risk as $x

✓ We can denote the investment medium risk as $y

✓We can denote the investment in low risk as($x + $y)

The summation of the investment = x + y +( x + y )= $300,000

If we add the like-terms together we have,

2x + 2y = $300,000

If we divide the both sides by 2, we have

x+y = 150,000

If we make "x" as subject of the formula, we have

x =150,000 -y •••••••••••eqn(**)

Total return on investments is

0.15x +0.10y +0 .06(x+y) = $30,000••••••••••••••••••••••••••••eqn(#)

Substitute for x from eqn(**) into equation (#)

0.15(150,000 -y) + 0.10y + 0.06(150,000-y +y) = 30,000

22500-0.15y+0.10y+9000= 30,000

0.05y=1500

y=1500/0.05

y=30,000

Recall, x =150,000 -y

Then

x = 150,000 - 30,000 = 120,000

y=30,000

x=120,000

Investment in low risk = x + y

= 30,000+120,000= 150,000

Hence, the investment in high risk

is $120,000, the investment medium risk is $30,000 and the investment in low risk is $ 150,000.

3 0

2 years ago

The journal entry to issue $600 of direct materials and $30 of indirect materials to production involves debit(s) to the ___

zmey [24]

The journal entry to issue $600 of direct materials and $30 of indirect materials to production involves debit(s) to the B. work-in-process inventory account for $600 and manufacturing overhead account for $30.

Work-in-process inventory refers to a company's goods that are waiting to be finished and completed. While these goods wait to be finished, they are waiting their overall value they are given as well. Manufacturing overhead refers to the items that are used for manufacturing. Everyting that has to take place and be paid for manufacturing to take place.

7 0

3 years ago

Explain the difference between primary and secondary authorities as sources of tax information. On which type of authority shoul

RSB [31]

Answer:

Primary sources represent the law itself as interpreted by the statutory, administrative and judicial entities of the government while secondary sources can be generally defined as interpretations of the law done by non-governmental entities.

The type of authority which professional tax research conclusions should be based on are the primary sources.

Explanation:

Primary sources of tax information are documents that are provided directly by an authority usually the government. Primary sources usually carry heavy weight especially when there is a conflict in the understanding of a federal tax law. These sources are often used by law practitioners as a basis in understanding cases of a similar nature. Some examples of primary sources of tax information include; internal revenue code, final and temporary regulations, non-codified federal tax statutes, and judicial decisions on tax matters. In general primary sources represent the law itself as interpreted by the statutory, administrative and judicial entities of the government. They can be used in a case where a tax payer in arguing his or her case about their tax position in a court of law.

Secondary sources of tax information are documents that are provided by information vendors who provide research services, legal analysis and tax professionals. These sources usually rely on the professionalism and experience of individuals who have gained a reputation on tax law for advice and direction. Some examples of secondary sources include; legal periodicals like academic journals, legal analysts, scholars and tax law reporters. Secondary sources can be generally defined as interpretations of the law done by non-governmental entities.

Professional research is usually done to enable one advance in his/her career in order to gain acceptance as an expert in that particular field. For one to join the ranks of a professional, they first need to prove their mastery of the knowledge in that particular profession. In our case, one needs to be aware of the law as provided by an authority. This means that one needs to argue his/her case in reference to the primary sources since these sources carry more weight in terms of understanding and experience as opposed to secondary sources that represent personal views that might be susceptible to bias. On this note, the type of authority which professional tax research conclusions should be based on are the primary sources.

5 0

3 years ago

John is a low-level employee at an accounting firm. In his duty as an employee at the firm, John forges documents and signatures

ANEK [815]

Answer:

the three of them could be held personally liable:

I. John
II. John's manager
III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.

Explanation:

John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.

6 0

3 years ago