Well, since we have not actually done this experiment, we cannot use a experimental probabiltity, so we can say the correct answer is: <span>
</span><span>D. The theoretical probability is 50%.</span>
Answer:
16 and 17
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
AAS postulate can be used to prove that these two triangles are congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us revise the cases of congruence
- SSS ⇒ 3 sides in the 1st Δ ≅ 3 sides in the 2nd Δ
- SAS ⇒ 2 sides and including angle in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 sides and including angle in the 2nd Δ
- ASA ⇒ 2 angles and the side whose joining them in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 angles and the side whose joining them in the 2nd Δ
- AAS ⇒ 2 angles and one side in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 angles and one side in the 2nd Δ
- HL ⇒ hypotenuse and leg of the 1st right Δ ≅ hypotenuse and leg of the 2nd right Δ
In the given figure
∵ There is a pair of vertically opposite angles
∵ The vertically opposite angles are congruent ⇒ (1)
∵ There are two angles have the same mark
∴ These marked angles are congruent ⇒ (2)
∵ There are two sides have the same mark
∴ These two marked sides are congruent ⇒ (3)
→ From (1), (2), and (3)
∴ The two triangles have 2 angles and 1 side congruent
→ By using case 4 above
∴ The two triangles are congruent by the AAS postulate of congruency.
AAS postulate can be used to prove that these two triangles are congruent
4000 divided by 95 is 42.1052631579because you can use a division table to answer this question 4000 inside 95 outside
