Answer:
CANDIDATE: By "advertise persuasively," are you referring to................ that I'm ready to sling mud just yet.
a) Character
CONSULTANT: I agree. It's best to get through the primary season without running attack ads Remember, because this is...................... and any registered voter may participate. The best-case scenario is that you'll win a clear majority of support. Options for...................... primary, voters don't have to declare their party identification,
b) An open
CANDIDATE: Absolutely. I want to have a decisive victory and avoid.............. possible. In your opinion, what is the best way to accomplish this?
b) A runoff
CONSULTANT: Name recognition is essential. Retail politics is still relevant, as is a good field organization. Our main focus, however, needs to be on the fundraising that will make it all possible. Without a lot of money in the bank, you will quickly be written off as unelectable because Texas campaigns are often quite.............................
b) Expensive
Explanation:
Above bolded words are the words that could be used to fill the dialogue inorder to have a complete sentence between the Candidate and the Consultant.
Total cost for the trip = $800.
Let x = original number of friends.
Therefore the equally shared cost of the trip for each friend is $800/x.
After 2 friends drop out, the cost for each friend increases to $800/(x-2).
The increase in cost for each remaining friend is $20, therefore
Divide through by 20.
Cross multiply.
x(x - 2) = 80
x² - 2x - 80 = 0
(x + 8)(x - 10) = 0
x = -8 or 10
Reject x = -8 because we cannot have a negative number for friends.
x = 10
Answer: There were 10 friends in the original group.
Answer:
Depends on how big your business is and what you can offer.
Explanation:
If you have a business that is bigger and has more to offer than the other company i would select a closer location. If you have a smaller business and have less or an equal amount to offer mover farther away. Try comparing the two business to each other. Think of your pro's and con's.
Answer:
Each of L team leaders has D group directors, making the total number of group directors equal to (L)(D). And each of those group directors has F fundraisers, again requiring multiplication: that total is (L)(D)(F). (You can try this by plugging in small numbers - if each of 2 leaders has 3 directors, you know there would be 6 directors)
So while statement 1 is not sufficient (there are multiple combinations that could get you to 81, such as L = 1, D = 2, and F = 39; or L = 1, D = 5, and F = 15), statement 2 guarantees that there is only one team leader. This is because 5 is a prime number, and you know that the number of group directors = LD. The only possible way for LD to equal 5 is if L is 1 and D is 5, or if D is 1 and L is 5. And since the stimulus tells you that there are more directors than leaders, the combination must be 5 directors and 1 leader. Accordingly, statement 2 is sufficient.
Explanation:
Answer:
5.13%
Explanation:
Given:
Worth of investment today (PV) = $1,000
Investment worth after 6 years (FV) = $1,350
Time period of investment (nper) = 6 Years
It is required to compute annual return (RATE). This can be computed using spreadsheet function =RATE(nper,-PV,FV).
Substituting the values, we get =RATE(6,-1000,1350)
= 5.13%
Present value is negative as it is a cash outflow.
Therefore, annual return is computes as 5.13%.
