Answer:
- 41.67%
Explanation:
For computing the rate of return first we have to compute the initial investment which is shown below:
= Number of shares × per share × initial margin percentage
= 300 shares × $60 per share × 60%
= $10,800
Now Loss on sale of common stock is
= (Selling price - purchase price) × number of shares purchased
= ($45 - $60 ) × 300 shares
= - $4,500
So the rate of return will be:
= Loss ÷ Initial Investment
= - $4,500 ÷ $10,800
= - 41.67%
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
The answer is B. Interest
Answer / Explanation:
To properly answer this question, we will first define some key terms which includes:
Surplus: This can be refereed to as an amount exceeding a particular requirement after it has been met.
Demand: This can be refereed to as the quantity of goods and serves a consumer or an individual is willing and pay for per time.
Now that we understand the basic concept above, we now refer back to the narrative of the question to try and answer t hem.
(a) With Provider A, the cost of an extra minute is $0. With Provider B, the cost of an extra minute is $1.
(b) With Provider A, my friend will purchase 150 minutes [= 150 – (50)(0)]. With Provider B, my friend would purchase 100 minutes [= 150 – (50)(1)].
(c) With Provider A, she would pay $120. With Provider B, he would pay $100.
(d) The figure below shows the friend’s demand. With Provider A, she buys 150 minutes and her consumer surplus is equal to (1/2)(3)(150) – 120 = 105. With Provider B, her consumer surplus is equal to (1/2)(2)(100) = 100
(e) I would recommend Provider A because she receives greater consumer surplus when buying from that provider.