Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
A single premium immediate annuity relates to the insurance company arrangement whereby one really pay them a large sum of money right up front (widely referred to as a premium price) and so on. The company promise to regularly (monthly, for example) give you a specific amount of benefits for the remaining of one's lifetime.
Income payments both for instant annuities are made on the basis of non-taxed main yields and earnings payouts that are taxed at levels of income tax instead of levels of capital gain.
Probably engineering and probably airplanes
The restriction on the building to prevent sale to persons of a particular race means it is unenforcable but the sale can go through.
Restrictions like this are unconstitutional because it is promotes discrimination of some race.
- Also, it is also unconstitutional to enforce a racially restrictive covenant although the existence does not prevent the conveyance going through.
.
- Hence, the restriction on the building to prevent sale to persons of a particular race means it is unenforcable but the sale can go through
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Missing options includes <em>"A. valid and enforceable B. unenforceable so the contract is void C. unenforcable but the sale can go through D. enforceable if the buyer agrees"</em>
<em />
Read more about House agreement
<em>brainly.com/question/1860153</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, if raj is sure that Mary will cooperate, then the possible outcomes of Raj's is $200 and $150 .
If Mary thinks that Raj will cheat and work independently, then Mary will also cheat and work independently because if cooperate and Raj cheats, then Mary will not have anything.
Answer:
D) Tenants in common
Explanation:
To be tenants in common you must be part of a tenancy in common agreement. A tenancy in common agreement is a situation in which 2 or more people hold interest in a property and each owner has the right to leave their share of the property to a beneficiary upon their death.
This doesn’t mean you own separate parts, but that you have separate interest in the whole property.
Tenants in common can have different ownership interests, e.g. Smith may own 60% of a property and Michael may own 40%.