Answer:
Formal operational
Explanation:
Jean Piaget develop a theory of cognitive development, according to which, children and teenagers go through different stages in the process of cognitive development. Each stage is qualitatively different from each other and as they go through stages, their thinking go through changes, from thinking based on actions to thinking based on ideas.
The last stage of his theory is called the formal operational stage and it takes place between age of 12 and up. During this stage, adolescents start to think abstractly and reason about hypothetical problems, they are also able to formulate hypothesis and test them in order to find theories and solutions to different problems based on abstract thought.
In this example, Raj is 12 years old and uses statistical analysis and scientific principles to predict the course of weather in New York. We can see that <u>he is thinking in an abstract way and using abstract tools such as statistical analysis in order to create his theory. </u>Therefore, because of his age and the type of thinking he is having, he is most likely in the formal operational stage of development.
According to the symbolic interaction is George Herbert mead wine organize games is important for an older child development of self because game playing involves learning to anticipate and coordinate with other players' actions.
Symbolic interaction is a sociological theory that springs from real-world issues and alludes to specific impacts of dialogue and interaction on people's ability to form mental representations and common sense conclusions for inference and correspondence with others.
Symbolic interaction, in the words of Macionis, is "a framework for creating theory that sees society as the product of everyday human interactions." In other words, it provides a framework for understanding how people connect with one another to build symbolic worlds, and how these worlds in turn influence how people behave.
To know more about symbolic interaction
brainly.com/question/4142906
#SPJ4
Answer:Slippery Slope fallacies
Explanation:
Slippery Slope: a slippery slope is based on rejecting a series of action without sufficient evidence or with no evidence that they will cause a series of unfortunate or undesirable ends.
So one accepts before something happens that particular actions or situations are bound to create a very prolematic future. One accepts that the future is doomed without even evidence that these recent series of action will bring that.
"The more people that come here, the more our government will have to provide for them. The more our government doles out, the further in debt our nation will become, and this means the higher our taxes will become! The next thing we will find is that our economy will be in just as poor a condition as the one from which these immigrants came! These are the events that has not been fully proven but there at assumptions that as they are listed they may cause a very negative outcome.
Answer:
Um, hell yeah. What Penn did is homocide. Cold-blooded murder. That's a crime.
Yes, we are im not sure what your options are but it is true
