Answer:
The answer is below
Step-by-step explanation:
a) To complete the table of values for y = 3x - 1, we substitute the value of x into the equation and find y.
For x = -2, y = 3(-2) - 1 = -7; For x = -1, y = 3(-1) - 1 = -4
For x = 0, y = 3(0) - 1 = -1; For x = 1, y = 3(1) - 1 = 2
For x = 2, y = 3(2) - 1 = 5; For x = 3, y = 3(3) - 1 = 8
x: -2 -1 0 1 2 3
y: -7 -4 -1 2 5 8
b) The graph is drawn using geogebra online graphing calculator.
c) From the graph, When x = 2.5, y = 6.5
Answer:
This shows 3 pivot position matrixes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given matrix is:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&-2&-5\\0&4&3\\-3&3&0\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D1%26-2%26-5%5C%5C0%264%263%5C%5C-3%263%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The option D is correct for this matrix.
The matrix is invertible and the given matrix has 3 pivot positions.
The matrix is invertible if its determinant is nonzero.
Multiply the 3rd row by 1/3.we get:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&-2&-5\\0&4&3\\-1&1&0\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D1%26-2%26-5%5C%5C0%264%263%5C%5C-1%261%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Now, add the first row with third row:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}0&-1&-5\\0&4&3\\-1&1&0\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D0%26-1%26-5%5C%5C0%264%263%5C%5C-1%261%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Replace third row by first row:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-1&1&0\\0&4&3\\0&-1&-5\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-1%261%260%5C%5C0%264%263%5C%5C0%26-1%26-5%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
This shows 3 pivot position matrixes.
Hence, a matrix is invertible and has 3 pivot positions.
Answer:
production cost f(x), in dollars, for x number of units produced by company 1:
f(x) = 0.05x^2 − 7x + 300
2) Table that represents the production cost g(x), in dollars, for x number of units produced by company 2:
x g(x)
0.6 899.58
0.8 899.52
1 899.50
1.2 899.52
1.4 899.58
3) Comparison: do a table for f(x) with the same x-values of the table for g(x).
x f(x) = 0.05x^2 − 7x + 300 g(x)
0.6 295.818 899.58
0.8 294.432 899.52
1 293.05 899.50
1.2 291.672 899.52
1.4 290.298 899.58
As you can see the values of f(x) are consistently lower than the values of g(x) for the same x-values.
The minimum production cost for company 2 is around 899.50 at x = 1, while the minimum production cost of company 1 is defintely lower (lower than 292.298 for sure, in fact if you find the vertex it is 55).
Answer: Based on the given information, the minimum production cost for company 2 is greater.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
its 3.6
Step-by-step explanation:
