Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.
Further Explanation:
Worcester v. Georgia was the case of 1832 of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Renounce the conviction of Worcester. Supreme Court also held that any land of America without the license by the state to be considered as unconstitutional. It built up doctrine of tribal sovereignty. The ruling laid out a strong relationship between the Indian nations and the USA. John Marshall said that the character of the USA government is federal. Indian states would not be given any authority in the American Indian affairs. Thus Georgia statute is unconstitutional. The ruling was given to avoid the political conflict of the court and the executive. The ruling had ordered for Worcester to be free and they complied to the order several months later. Later in 1833 the new governor Wilson Lumpkin gave the order to pardon Worcester if they stop their activities in the Cherokee. Worcester and Butler complied to the order and they both were set free. Worcester came to the Indian Territory when Cherokee removal was on trial in 1836. Worcester joined his ministry back and translated the bible backing to Cherokee. The first printing press was established in the USA that worked with Cherokee for publishing the newspaper. There are several treaties between the USA government and the Cherokee.
Learn more:
1. Compare and contrast lifestyle choices that positively affect physical fitness with those that negatively affect physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/951060
</u>
2. Discuss why a physically active job does not guarantee better physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/1617174
</u>
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia
Subject: Social Science
Keywords: Conviction, license, unconstitutional, American Indian affairs, political conflict, new governor, Wilson Lumpkin, first printing press.
Well, uniting against a common enemy has always been a great unifier. Plus, literally fighting for freedom made every person fighting believe very deeply in their cause, and so they could overcome differences with each other for that cause.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder a la pregunta podemos comentar lo siguiente.
El desarrollo de las guerras civiles entre los conquistadores, influenció en el Virreinato del Perú al grado en que existieron varios conflictos durante los años posteriores a la conquista del imperio Inca por parte de los Españoles.
Esos conflictos y guerras civilices entre los conquistadores Españoles fueron el resultado de la avaricia y la descontrolada ambición del poder. El Perú siempre ha contado con inmensas riquezas naturales y materias primas. y los conquistadores ambicionaron tener esas riquezas, y ese fue uno de los motivos principales de tanto conflicto.
La última guerra o rebelión de los encomenderos fue a manos de Francisco Hernández Girón, antes de la llegada del virrey de Mendoza quien pudo al fin traer relativa paz a la región andina del Perú.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The Republican Party was not in favor of extending slavery into new territories and hence they were strongly committed to it.
And this is the reason why Kansas-Nebraska Act gained controversy as it was giving rights to the city dwellers to permit slavery in their respective territories in lieu of a vote.
Hence, option B is correct
