9514 1404 393
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If we let x represent one of the numbers, then you want ...
x(58 -x) = 201.25
x² -58x +201.25 = 0 . . . . . put in standard form
(x² -58x +29²) +201.25 -29² = 0 . . . . complete the square
(x -29)² -639.75 = 0
x -29 = ±√639.75 . . . . . add 639.75 and take the square root
x = 29 ±√639.75 . . . . . . add 29
The two numbers of interest are ...
29 +√639.75 ≈ 54.2933
29 -√639.75 ≈ 3.7067
Answer:
<h3>The best interpretation of this equation 4x=3x is that the equation has no solution</h3>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Kate begins solving the equation
<h3>To find the best interpretation of the given equation :</h3><h3>Katie's steps are</h3>
When she adds 2 to both sides, the equation becomes
Therefore 
<h3>Therefore the given equation has no solution </h3><h3>The best interpretation of this equation 4x=3x is that the equation has no solution.</h3><h3>Therefore the option no solution is correct</h3>
It is just asking to find the sum of interior angles
So follow this rule 180(n-2)
180(5-2)
180(3)= 540
So in another words: a+b+c+d+e=540
Firstly I would revert these back to improper fractions:
So 17/6 ÷ 24/5
Then I would use keep, change, flip
So 17/6 * 5/24
Finally simplify
85/144
Final Answer: 85/144
