Answer: both safe and effective.
Explanation:
In 1962, there was a drug in Europe and Canada that was meant to treat morning sickness in pregnant women. The drug instead caused birth defects in many people.
The Federal government of the US decided that it would be best to take action against that drug and others like it from harming the U.S. like it did those other countries.
This action came in the form of the Kefauver-Harris amendment to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act. According to this amendment, companies manufacturing drugs had to make sure that a drug was not only safe for consumption, but effective in treating what it is meant to treat as well.
Answer:
I think true if its wrong I'm sorry
Answer:
Was not constrained by the bystander effect.
Explanation:
The bystander effect may be defined as the psychological effect that might discourages the individual from intervening in the situation. The individual take more positive action in case of crisis only.
The greater the chance of the bystander the lower the chance to get help in the distress. As described the situation in the question, Eddies' behavior is not controlled by the bystander effect as he immediately went to get help from the other people.
Thus, the answer is- not constrained by the bystander effect.
Answer:
endosteal.
Explanation:
implant surically embedded into the bone. implant. artificial teeth attached to anchors that have been surgically embedded into the bone. osseointegration.
