Answer:
Internal validity
Step-by-step explanation:
The internal validity here is weak
Internal validity describes the extent to which an evidence weighs the cause and effect claim. In this study, the internal validity that brought about failure in the new exam is mainly due to the environment where the exam was written and not the new exam itself.
So this validity is weak in claiming that the new exam is not a good substitute for the old exam.
Putting them in the same good environment might help the researchers to draw a better conclusion.
1) f(x)=2x
when x=3 then f(x) =3×2=<em><u>6</u></em>
when x=4 then f(x)=4×2=<em><u>8</u></em>
2)At y=35(no. of mangoes),x corresponds to y=60(amount)
so$<em><u>6</u></em><em><u>0</u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>amount</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>he</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>need</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>to</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>spend</u></em><em><u>!</u></em>
3) f(x)= x+2
for x=1, f(x)=1+2=<em><u>3</u></em>
for x=2,f(x)=2+2=<em><u>4</u></em>
✌️:)
For this case, what you must do is to see in which scenario the speed of keeping constant during a certain time.
"A person biking on a trail at 1212 miles per hour for 2020 minutes"
We observe that the distance in this case is proportional to the time and the constant of proportionality is the speed.
In other words:
d = v * t
Answer:
the distance traveled is proportional to time in:
"A person biking on a trail at 1212 miles per hour for 2020 minutes"
Answer:
SP=Rs 800
Step-by-step explanation:
→As we have,
→Profit=SP-CP
Now,
