1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreyandreev [35.5K]
3 years ago
15

When calcium chloride is dissolved in water, to which end of the adjacent water molecules will a calcium ion be attracted? the o

xygen end, which is the negative pole the oxygen end, which is the positive pole the hydrogen end, which is the negative pole the hydrogen end, which is the positive pole?
Chemistry
1 answer:
Lesechka [4]3 years ago
6 0
Ca ionises into Ca^2+. Ca^2+ will be attracted to O^2- ions in the water, since opposite charges attract. (Hydrogen in water forms H^+)
You might be interested in
A 150.0 mL solution of 2.888 M strontium nitrate is mixed with 200.0 mL of a 3.076 M sodium fluoride solution. Calculate the mas
Lelechka [254]

Answer:

Mass SrF2 produced = 38.63 g SrF2 produced

[Na^+]:  = 1.758 M

[NO3^-]:  = 1.238 M

[Sr^2+] = 0.3589 M

[F^-] = 2.36*10^-5 M

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Volume of 2.888M strontium nitrate = 150.0 mL = 0.150 L

Volume of 3.076 M sodium fluoride = 200.0 mL = 0.200 L

Step 2 : The balanced equation

Sr(NO3)2(aq) + 2NaF(aq) → SrF2(s) + 2NaNO3(aq) → Sr2+ + 2F- + 2

Step 3: Calculate moles strontium nitrate

Moles Sr(NO3)2 = Molarity * volume  

Moles Sr(NO3)2 = 2.888 M * 0.150 L

Moles Sr(NO3)2 = 0.4332 moles

Step 4: Calculate moles NaF

Moles NaF = 3.076 M * 0.200 L

Moles NaF = 0.6152 moles

It takes 2 moles F^- to precipitate 1 mole Sr^2+, so F^- is limiting.

Step 5: Calculate limiting reactant

For 1 mol of Sr(NO3)2 we need 2 moles of NaF to produce 1 mol of SrF2 and 2 moles of NaNO3

NaF is the limiting reactant. It will completely be consumed (0.6152 moles).

Sr(NO3)2 is in excess. There will react 0.6152/2 = 0.3076 moles

Moles Sr^2+ precipitated by F^- = 0.3076

There will remain 0.4332 - 0.3076 = 0.1256 moles of Sr(NO3)2

Moles Sr^2+ no precipitated (left over) = 0.1256 moles

Step 6: Calculate moles SrF2  

For 1 mol of Sr(NO3)2 we need 2 moles of NaF to produce 1 mol of SrF2 and 2 moles of NaNO3

For 0.6152 moles NaF we have 0.6152/2 = 0.3076 moles of SrF2

Mass SrF2 produced:  0.3076 mol * 125.6 g/mol = 38.63 g SrF2 produced

Step 7: Calculate concentration of [Na+] and [NO3-]

Since both Na^+ and NO3^- are spectator ions, and the final volume is 150 ml + 200 ml = 350 ml (0.350 L), the concentrations of Na^+ and NO3^- can be calculated as follows:

[Na^+]:  (200 ml)(3.076 M) = (350 ml)(x M) and x = 1.758 M

[NO3^-]:  (150 ml)(2.888 M)(2) = (350 ml)(x M) = 1.238 M

Step 8: Calculate [Sr^2+] and [F^-]

[Sr^2+] = 0.1256 moles/0.350 L = 0.3589 M

To find [F^-], one needs the Ksp for SrF2.  There are several values listed in the literature. I am using a value of 2x10^-10.

SrF2(s) <==> Sr^2+(aq) + 2F^-(aq)

Ksp = [Sr^2+][F^-]²

2x10^-10 = (0.3589)(x)²

x² = 5.57*10^-10

x = [F^-] = 2.36*10^-5 M

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose you want to determine which type of paper falls the fastest; an unfolded sheet of paper, a sheet of paper folded into fo
AnnZ [28]
For starters, I would get the same height for each paper, such as a counter top. Then, I would make said paper. You would use a timer of course, maybe even something like a speed gun to calculate the speed as said paper falls. You would push each paper off the counter top and calculate the speed for each paper. This is the easiest way to prove your hypothesis.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which change can be easily be reversed? question 23 options: both a physical and chemical change chemical change physical change
givi [52]
Physical change .. you cannot undo chemical ... physical is like bending , shattering a mirror , denting something ..
chemical would be rust or something .

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would be the best object for stirring hot liquids? (1 point)
MakcuM [25]
A Wooden Spoon is your answer because metal attracts heat more, so it would get hotter.

The wooden spoon would not, so you would use that.

Glad I could help, and good luck!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would an increase in temperatures be detrimental to the tundra? Select all that apply.
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

I think the answers are... b, d, and maybe a. I don't know for sure. So only put these answers in if you trust me!

Explanation:

I had this very question, and I put in what I think were the answers.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The temperature at which there is no kinetic energy in an object . Is?? ASAP
    7·2 answers
  • Which two terns describe this type of data? First to answer (correct) gets brainlist
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following bonds is the strongest? H-H C-CI C=O N-N
    5·2 answers
  • Why do humans primarily form communities ?
    9·2 answers
  • How do the number of daylight hours affect temperature
    8·2 answers
  • Water can dissolve other substances. Which factor best contributes to this property of water?
    10·2 answers
  • Most living things need oxygen to survive. These two body systems bring oxygen into your body and then move to all your body par
    12·2 answers
  • A student completed a lab report. Which correctly describes the difference between the “Question” and “Hypothesis” sections of h
    6·2 answers
  • Which action best demonstrates the transformation of mechanical energy to heat energy?
    6·2 answers
  • In the reaction, HCl + NaOH NaCl + H₂O, what is/are the reactant(s)?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!