1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AleksAgata [21]
4 years ago
13

Let C(x) be the statement "x has a cat," let D(x) be the statement "x has a dog," and let F(x) be the statement "x has a ferret.

" Express each of these statements in terms of C(x), D(x), F(x), quantifiers, and logical connectives. Let the domain consist of all students in your class. a) A student in your class has a cat, a dog, and a ferret. b) All students in your class have a cat, a dog, or a ferret. c) Some student in your class has a cat and a ferret, but not a dog. d) No student in your class has a cat, a dog, and a ferret. e) For each of the three animals, cats, dogs, and ferrets, there is a student in your class who has this animal as a pet.
Mathematics
1 answer:
jek_recluse [69]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

\mathbf{a)} \left( \exists x \in X\right) \; C(x) \; \wedge \; D(x) \; \wedge \; F(x)\\\mathbf{b)} \left( \forall x \in X\right) \; C(x) \; \vee \; D(x) \; \vee \; F(x)\\\mathbf{c)} \left( \exists x \in X\right) \; C(x) \; \wedge \; F(x) \; \wedge \left(\neg \; D(x) \right)\\\mathbf{d)} \left( \forall x \in X\right) \; \neg C(x) \; \vee \; \neg D(x) \; \vee \; \neg F(x)\\\mathbf{e)} \left((\exists x\in X)C(x) \right) \wedge  \left((\exists x\in X) D(x) \right) \wedge \left((\exists x\in X) F(x) \right)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let X be a set of all students in your class. The set X is the domain. Denote

                                        C(x) -  ' \text{$x $ has a cat}'\\D(x) -  ' \text{$x$ has a dog}'\\F(x) -  ' \text{$x$ has a ferret}'

\mathbf{a)}

Consider the statement '<em>A student in your class has a cat, a dog, and a ferret</em>'. This means that \exists x \in X so that all three statements C(x), D(x) and F(x) are true. We can express that in terms of C(x), D(x) and F(x) using quantifiers, and logical connectives as follows

                         \left( \exists x \in X\right) \; C(x) \; \wedge \; D(x) \; \wedge \; F(x)

\mathbf{b)}

Consider the statement '<em>All students in your class have a cat, a dog, or a ferret.' </em>This means that \forall x \in X at least one of the statements C(x), D(x) and F(x) is true. We can express that in terms of C(x), D(x) and F(x) using quantifiers, and logical connectives as follows

                        \left( \forall x \in X\right) \; C(x) \; \vee \; D(x) \; \vee F(x)

\mathbf{c)}

Consider the statement '<em>Some student in your class has a cat and a ferret, but not a dog.' </em>This means that \exists x \in X so that the statements C(x), F(x) are true and the negation of the statement D(x) . We can express that in terms of C(x), D(x) and F(x) using quantifiers, and logical connectives as follows

                      \left( \exists x \in X\right) \; C(x) \; \wedge \; F(x) \; \wedge \left(\neg \; D(x) \right)

\mathbf{d)}

Consider the statement '<em>No student in your class has a cat, a dog, and a ferret..' </em>This means that \forall x \in X none of  the statements C(x), D(x) and F(x) are true. We can express that in terms of C(x), D(x) and F(x) using quantifiers, and logical connectives as a negation of the statement in the part a), as follows

\neg \left( \left( \exists x \in X\right) \; C(x) \; \wedge \; D(x) \; \wedge \; F(x)\right) \iff \left( \forall x \in X\right) \; \neg C(x) \; \vee \; \neg D(x) \; \vee \; \neg F(x)

\mathbf{e)}

Consider the statement '<em> For each of the three animals, cats, dogs, and ferrets, there is a student in your class who has this animal as a pet.' </em>

This means that for each of the statements C, F and D there is an element from the domain X so that each statement holds true.

We can express that in terms of C(x), D(x) and F(x) using quantifiers, and logical connectives as follows

           \left((\exists x\in X)C(x) \right) \wedge  \left((\exists x\in X) D(x) \right) \wedge \left((\exists x\in X) F(x) \right)

You might be interested in
The end of a hose was resting on the ground, pointing up an angle. Sal measured the path of the water coming out of the hose and
lawyer [7]

Functions can be used to model real life situations.

The hose is 3.2 feet above the ground, at a horizontal distance of 4 fee

The function is given as:

f(x) =-0.3x^2 + 2x

At a horizontal distance of 4 feet, the value of x is 4

i.e. x = 4

Substitute 4 for x in f(x).

So, we have:

f(4) =-0.3(4)^2 + 2(4)

Evaluate the exponent

f(4) =-0.3(16) + 2(4)

Open both brackets

f(4) =-4.8 + 8

Add -4.8 and 8

f(4) =3.2

Hence, the hose is 3.2 feet above the ground

Read more about functions at:

brainly.com/question/10837575

7 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ian solved the system of equations by making a substitution for y in the second equation. What equation did
Aleonysh [2.5K]

5x -2(-3x+1) =31

5x +6x-2=31

Choice B

6 0
3 years ago
Help me ASAP<br>factorise; a=b-bx<br>10 points to whoever answers this​
Serhud [2]

Answer:

a=-b(x-1)

Step-by-step explanation:

Is it factored, but that question doesn't have too much helpful in it

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4 + 3(4 - 9^0)+ 5^-3i
frutty [35]

Answer:

13.008 or 13 1/125 or 1626/125

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The lifespans of seals in a particular zoo are normally distributed. The average seal lives
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

2.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

It is given that:

lifespans of seals in a particular zoo are normally distributed. The average seal lives 13.8 years and the standard deviation is 3.2 years.

We want to use the empirical rule to estimate the probability of a seal living longer than 7.4

Let's calculate the z-score of 7.4 using

z =  \frac{x -  \mu}{ \sigma}

z =  \frac{7.4 - 13.8}{3.2}

z =  - 2.00

According to empirical rule, 95% of the distribution is within 2 standard deviations, i.e (-2 to 2)

So from (-2 to 0), we would have 47.5%

Since we are looking for the area to the left of -2.00 we subtract this from 50%

to get 2.5%

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jonathan rode 1.05 miles on Friday 1.5 miles on Saturday 1.25 miles on Monday and 1.1 miles on Tuesday. On which day did he ride
    7·1 answer
  • Is the product of two irrational numbers always irrational? Justify your answer.
    9·1 answer
  • When Simone planned her hike, she sketched the backpack she wanted to buy. In her drawing, the backpack was 8 centimeters wide a
    14·1 answer
  • 1/10 divided by 5 help help help help help
    11·2 answers
  • Need help ASAP! For math SAT tmrw plz help!!
    12·1 answer
  • Helpppppp pleaseeeeee​
    7·1 answer
  • An airplane descends 1.6 miles to an elevation of 6.95 miles. Find the elevation of the plane before its
    6·1 answer
  • Isaac applied the steps below to find the product of (4.2)(–5.4). Step 1: (4.2)(–5.4) = (–5.4)(4.2) Step 2: = (–5.4)(4) + (–5.4)
    14·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP It's homework: Compound Probability (Without Replacement) 1.) A box of chocolates contains six milk chocolates and six
    11·1 answer
  • In a test, 30 of the 36 students obtained passing grades. What percentage of the students
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!