Answer:
Explanation:
Change in length of spring = 2.13 m
Component of weight acting on spring = mg sinθ
so
mg sinθ = k x where k is spring constant and x is total stretch due to force on the spring.
Here x = 2.13
mg sin17 = k x 2.13
31 x 9.8 sin17 = k x 2.13
k = 41.7 N/m
b ) In case surface had friction , spring would have stretched by less distance .
It is so because , the work done by gravity in stretching down is stored as potential energy in spring . In case of dissipative force like friction , it also takes up some energy in the form of heat etc so spring stretches less.
let the length of the beam be "L"
from the diagram
AD = length of beam = L
AC = CD = AD/2 = L/2
BC = AC - AB = (L/2) - 1.10
BD = AD - AB = L - 1.10
m = mass of beam = 20 kg
m₁ = mass of child on left end = 30 kg
m₂ = mass of child on right end = 40 kg
using equilibrium of torque about B
(m₁ g) (AB) = (mg) (BC) + (m₂ g) (BD)
30 (1.10) = (20) ((L/2) - 1.10) + (40) (L - 1.10)
L = 1.98 m
Answer:
Therefore the ratio of diameter of the copper to that of the tungsten is
Explanation:
Resistance: Resistance is defined to the ratio of voltage to the electricity.
The resistance of a wire is
- directly proportional to its length i.e
- inversely proportional to its cross section area i.e
Therefore
ρ is the resistivity.
The unit of resistance is ohm (Ω).
The resistivity of copper(ρ₁) is 1.68×10⁻⁸ ohm-m
The resistivity of tungsten(ρ₂) is 5.6×10⁻⁸ ohm-m
For copper:
......(1)
Again for tungsten:
........(2)
Given that and
Dividing the equation (1) and (2)
[since and ]
Therefore the ratio of diameter of the copper to that of the tungsten is