This one is jurisdiction and its the power or right to hear and decide on a case.
The answer is<u> "watching a moving object".</u>
Sound and object movement can be utilized to change perceptions about body measure, as indicated by another investigation by a global group including UCL analysts.
At the point when an object is dropped, the brain precisely predicts when it will hit the floor by considering the range from which it fell. Falsely stretching the time it takes to hear the effect of the protest on the ground drives individuals to refresh their apparent body stature, making them feel taller.
The answer to this statement is false. It is because yes, it is the job of the military professional to do necessary things to contribute to common good or to promote common good. But using any means necessary is not appropriate to handle this situation even if it is for the good cause. It is best to follow measures and standards because using any means necessary is like being able to do anything you want even if it is bad just to produce something good.
Answer:
Content validity
Explanation:
Content validity refers to the fact that a study actually measures all aspects of the construct.
For a study to be valid, <u>the measurement method must cover all relevant parts of the subject it is measuring</u>. If it doesn't do so, then the validity of the study is treatment because of content validity.
In this case, the construct we are studying (quality of a relationship) has three parts (belong, interdependence and intimacy). Since <u>the questionnaire doesn't include items tapping intimacy it is not covering all three parts of the construct</u> and therefore it is lacking content validity.
I think the answer is B because why would anyone care if he made money or not. Also i think it because the others don't seem right. Hope i'm not to late.
