Answer:
the answer to 30-60-90=0
Step-by-step explanation:
90-60=30-30=0
Try to relax. Your desperation has surely progressed to the point where
you're unable to think clearly, and to agonize over it any further would only
cause you more pain and frustration.
I've never seen this kind of problem before. But I arrived here in a calm state,
having just finished my dinner and spent a few minutes rubbing my dogs, and
I believe I've been able to crack the case.
Consider this: (2)^a negative power = (1/2)^the same power but positive.
So:
Whatever power (2) must be raised to, in order to reach some number 'N',
the same number 'N' can be reached by raising (1/2) to the same power
but negative.
What I just said in that paragraph was: log₂ of(N) = <em>- </em>log(base 1/2) of (N) .
I think that's the big breakthrough here.
The rest is just turning the crank.
Now let's look at the problem:
log₂(x-1) + log(base 1/2) (x-2) = log₂(x)
Subtract log₂(x) from each side:
log₂(x-1) - log₂(x) + log(base 1/2) (x-2) = 0
Subtract log(base 1/2) (x-2) from each side:
log₂(x-1) - log₂(x) = - log(base 1/2) (x-2) Notice the negative on the right.
The left side is the same as log₂[ (x-1)/x ]
==> The right side is the same as +log₂(x-2)
Now you have: log₂[ (x-1)/x ] = +log₂(x-2)
And that ugly [ log to the base of 1/2 ] is gone.
Take the antilog of each side:
(x-1)/x = x-2
Multiply each side by 'x' : x - 1 = x² - 2x
Subtract (x-1) from each side:
x² - 2x - (x-1) = 0
x² - 3x + 1 = 0
Using the quadratic equation, the solutions to that are
x = 2.618
and
x = 0.382 .
I think you have to say that <em>x=2.618</em> is the solution to the original
log problem, and 0.382 has to be discarded, because there's an
(x-2) in the original problem, and (0.382 - 2) is negative, and
there's no such thing as the log of a negative number.
There,now. Doesn't that feel better.
We are given with
a1 = 2
r = 4
These are components of a geometric series. The first term is 2 and the common ratio is 4. To get the first six terms, we use the formula:
an = a1 r^(n-1)
a1 = 2 (4)^(1-1) = 2
a2 = 2 (4)^(2-1) = 8
a3 = 2 (4)^(3-1) = 32
a4 = 2 (4)^(4-1) = 128
a5 = 2 (4)^(5-1) = 512
a6 = 2 (4)^(6-1) = 2048
The general statement that is true about retirement is <em>B. your </em><em>income </em><em>will decrease, while your </em><em>expenses </em><em>will increase.</em>
Retirement is the leaving of one's of occupation. This means you cease to be involved in active service in a job or occupation especially when one is considered old and of retirement age.
During retirement, retirement benefits and pension are usually made available to retirees. However, one's income will come to a decline which makes most people scared of retirement. Keeping up with the standard of living they are used to becomes difficult as income to sustain such may not be available.
Therefore, the general statement that is true about retirement is <em>B. your </em><em>income </em><em>will decrease, while your </em><em>expenses </em><em>will increase.</em>
<em />
Learn more about retirement on:
brainly.com/question/3063811
Complete Question
A milling process has an upper specification of 1.68 millimeters and a lower specification of 1.52 millimeters. A sample of parts had a mean of 1.6 millimeters with a standard deviation of 0.03 millimeters. what standard deviation will be needed to achieve a process capability index f 2.0?
Answer:
The value required is
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The upper specification is 
The lower specification is
The sample mean is
The standard deviation is 
Generally the capability index in mathematically represented as
![Cpk = min[ \frac{USL - \mu }{ 3 * \sigma } , \frac{\mu - LSL }{ 3 * \sigma } ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Cpk%20%20%3D%20%20min%5B%20%5Cfrac%7BUSL%20-%20%20%5Cmu%20%7D%7B%203%20%2A%20%20%5Csigma%20%7D%20%20%2C%20%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cmu%20-%20LSL%20%7D%7B%203%20%2A%20%20%5Csigma%20%7D%20%5D)
Now what min means is that the value of CPk is the minimum between the value is the bracket
substituting value given in the question
![Cpk = min[ \frac{1.68 - 1.6 }{ 3 * 0.03 } , \frac{1.60 - 1.52 }{ 3 * 0.03} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Cpk%20%20%3D%20%20min%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1.68%20-%20%201.6%20%7D%7B%203%20%2A%20%200.03%20%7D%20%20%2C%20%20%5Cfrac%7B1.60%20-%20%201.52%20%7D%7B%203%20%2A%20%200.03%7D%20%5D)
=> ![Cpk = min[ 0.88 , 0.88 ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Cpk%20%20%3D%20%20min%5B%200.88%20%2C%200.88%20%20%5D)
So

Now from the question we are asked to evaluated the value of standard deviation that will produce a capability index of 2
Now let assuming that

So

=> 
=> 
So

=> 
Hence
![Cpk = min[ 2, 2 ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Cpk%20%20%3D%20%20min%5B%202%2C%202%20%5D)
So

So
is the value of standard deviation required