Answer:
1/26
Step-by-step explanation:
9*12=108
4*x=4x
so, 4x/108
4x=108
x=27
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that AE=BE and
.
We can see that angle CEA is vertical angle of angle DEB, therefore,
as vertical angles are congruent.
We can see in triangles CEA and DEF that two angles and included sides are congruent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45e8c/45e8c3e7be95d80891d697784fdd49f67c0ecf9c" alt="\angle 1\cong \angle 2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f653/9f653ed5824a297a7281075fc75d74826e31c310" alt="AE=BE"
or
Therefore,
by ASA postulate.
Since corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent, therefore CE must be congruent to DE.
The <u>whole number</u> <u>closest </u>to √22 is 5.
The square root of 22 is:
= √22
= 4.69
The whole number that it is closest to will <u>depend on the first decimal point</u>.
If it is 5 or above then it will be closest to 5.
If it is 4 and below, then it is closest to 4.
The first decimal point is 6 so √22 is closer to 5.
In conclusion, the square root of 22 is closer to 5.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/3409224.</em>
Answer: Option #4: the 0.2 could be changed to 2.
Explanation:
The table is designed to make the concept of percentages more understandable. The table first allocates the total amount of 70 in terms of its "fifths," or 20% parts. Then it expresses these parts in the last row of the table, showing that 20% of 70 is 14 and all the five parts sum up to 70 again.
Now, Mikel is supposed to express 40% of the amount. So she writes (incorrectly): 0.2 * 14. This statement needs to be changed to 2 * 14 (two times 14 = 28), to correspond to 2 times 20%, or 40% of 70.
This is reflected in the last (fourth) option "The 0.2 in the expression could be changed to 2."
Option #3 is incorrect because changing 14 to 70, will result in an incorrect number (2.8).
Options 1 and 2 are similarly incorrect (as can be easily verified)