Answer:
B
Explanation:
YAN PO I HOPE IT HELPS PO PA BRAINLY NA LNG PO
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer:
The correct answer is c. actual market outcomes provide a higher price than the efficient price of education.
Explanation:
In any country, there is a close positive correlation between a greater number of years of study and income, just as a higher degree of education is related to a lower incidence of poverty. In general, knowledge provides a great deal of benefits to its holders, so why might a government policy for investment in human capital be necessary? The answer could be that knowledge generates a series of “external benefits”, which are not always considered by people when making their decisions.
Economic activities generate costs and benefits, which can be private or external. In this way, whoever studies obtains a benefit for himself, for example a better salary, as explained above. That is the private benefit. But a series of external benefits are also generated, for example, the possibility of being better citizens, of improving the communication and performance of people in society, of generating new solutions to different human problems, among many others. Likewise, research and development activities lead to obtaining new knowledge. All these benefits are obtained thanks to preschool, primary, secondary, technical, university education, job training, among others.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
Trademark infringement refers to the violation of the exclusive privileges assigned to a trademark without including the permission of the trademark owner and any licensee Violation that arise when one person, the "infringer," uses a trademark that is equivalent or ambiguously related to a trademark used by some other group in connection to goods or services that are equivalent or identical to the goods or services.
Where the corresponding marks and products are wholly different, violation of the trademark could still be identified if the recorded label is well recognized under the Paris Agreement. In the U.s a cause of litigation is termed trademark dilution with the use of a label for such significantly different facilities.
