If increased government spending spurs a short-run expansion. The statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
<h3>What is aggregate supply?</h3>
Aggregate supply can be defined as the overall amount of goods and service that a firm intend to produce and supply at a point in time or at a particular period of time.
If an increase in government spending lead to short run expansion this means that there will be shift in aggregate supply of goods and service as aggregate supply will tend to shift to the left.
Therefore the statement that complete the gap is:<u> Shifts to the left</u>, <u>Output endresources.</u>
Learn more about aggregate supply here:brainly.com/question/19802257
#SPJ1
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
While often associated with illegal activity, insider trading encompasses both illegal and legal trading of securities and is monitored by the <em>Securities and Exchange Commission </em>(SEC). Illegal insider trading occurs when a person uses material, non-public information to decide between buying or selling a security.
Legal insider trading takes place when corporate insiders, officers, directors, and employees trade securities issued by their own company. When a corporate insider buys or sells his company's securities, this trading activity must be reported to the SEC, which then discloses this information to the public.
Answer:
The total number of firms in this industry will decrease in the long run because increased competition will mean lower profit margins which will lead to some firms earning sub normal profits which will force them to leave the industry.
Explanation:
It would actually be an increased production by the business.
Haha, I had to think for a tiny bit and re-check my answer to make sure it was right before giving it. Would hate to see you get it wrong.
