Answer:
B most likley because i dont see hwo it can be A or D because both will lower an employees wages
Explanation:
Answer:
It should accepted.
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Units&Cost&Total\\$Special Order&49&2,590&126,910\\$Variable Cost&49&1,440&-70,560\\$rejected local&&&0\\$additional cost&&&0\\$Net Income&&&56350\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Units%26Cost%26Total%5C%5C%24Special%20Order%2649%262%2C590%26126%2C910%5C%5C%24Variable%20Cost%2649%261%2C440%26-70%2C560%5C%5C%24rejected%20local%26%26%260%5C%5C%24additional%20cost%26%26%260%5C%5C%24Net%20Income%26%26%2656350%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
We will compare the Special order with the variable cost associate with their productions.
As the orders has a postive income after variables expenses it should be accepted as contributes with the payment of fixed cost and this sales wasn't planned when solvign for the cost. Not doing the sale will avoid the comapny the opportunity of a profitable business cappable of allocate more fixed cost.
Answer:
The total loss in welfare to the economy will be -$32.
Explanation:
By intersecting the supply function QS to the demand function QD, we will find the equilibrium price:
QD = QS
16P - 8 = 64 - 16P
16P + 16P = 64 +8 =
32P = 72
P = $2.00
Replacing the equilibrium price either in QS or QD, we foind the equilibrium quantity:
QS = 64 - 16*2 = 64 -32
QS = 32
In this case the total revenues at the equilibrium price RE will be:
RE = 32 * $2 = $64
On the other hand if the government imposes a price floor at $3.00, then the new total revenues RN will be:
RN = 32 * $3 = $96
Therefore the total losses is find by subtracting the revenue at the goverment price floor RN to the revenue at the equilibrium price RE:
LT = RE - RN
LT = $64 - $96 = -$32
Answer:
There is a great scope for its growth in the future.
Hope this helps.
