Answer:
I think it is the second one because -4 is the least
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
no it is not
Step-by-step explanation:
1.
height= 3
length= 5
width= 4
The number of cubes would be the result of the multiplication of the side measures. Doing so, we have:
3 x 5 x 4 = 60
We need 60 blocks
2
height= 4
length= 6
width= 4
The number of cubes would be the result of the multiplication of the side measures. Doing so, we have:
4 x 6 x 4 = 96
We need 96 blocks
3
height= 2
length= 3
width= 4
The number of cubes would be the result of the multiplication of the side measures. Doing so, we have:
2 x 3 x 4 = 24
We need 24 blocks
4
height= 4
length= 8
width= 6
The number of cubes would be the result of the multiplication of the side measures. Doing so, we have:
4 x 8 x 6 = 192
We need 192 blocks
5
height= 2
length= 6
width= 4
The number of cubes would be the result of the multiplication of the side measures. Doing so, we have:
2 x 6 x 4 = 48
We need 48 blocks
6
height= 1
length= 5
width= 3
The number of cubes would be the result of the multiplication of the side measures. Doing so, we have:
1 x 5 x 3 = 15
We need 15 blocks
7
Answer:
inequality 3n+5>9+n, subtract 5 from both sides to get 3n>4+n, now subtract n from both sides to get 2n>4 and divide both sides by 2 to get n>2 :)
Step-by-step explanation: