<span><span>Physical boundaries pertain to your personal space, privacy, and body. Do you give a handshake or a hug – to whom and when? How do you feel about loud music, nudity, and locked doors?</span><span><span>Mental boundaries </span>apply to your thoughts, values, and opinions. Are you easily suggestible? Do you know what you believe, and can you hold onto your opinions? Can you listen with an open mind to someone else’s opinion without becoming rigid? If you become highly emotional, argumentative, or defensive, you may have weak emotional boundaries.</span><span>Emotional boundaries distinguish separating your emotions and responsibility for them from someone else’s. It’s like an imaginary line or force field that separates you and others. Healthy boundaries prevent you from giving advice, blaming or accepting blame. They protect you from feeling guilty for someone else’s negative feelings or problems and taking others’ comments personally. High reactivity suggests weak emotional boundaries. Healthy emotional boundaries require clear internal boundaries – knowing your feelings and your responsibilities to yourself and others.</span></span>
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
When trying to understand issues, silence is a great tool, To be in the mood of silence, it helps to get every details of an issue or explanation.
Relating this to the answer choices above, it is very useful when you are following detailed analysis of the client issues, when your client is trying to explain the what he/she observed to be the root cause of a problem, when you are silence and paying attention, it help you to understand your customers pain point and helps to figure out how to solve the problem.
Answer: Veto
Explanation: "a constitutional right to reject a decision or proposal made by a law-making body.
"
Answer:
write this in english
Explanation:
so that the people cna answer it
Answer:
- Matthew the Epistle
- Hebrew
- Tax-collector
Explanation:
The gospel now known as the Gospel of Matthew was anonymous.
Papias attributed a gospel to Matthew in the second century, according to what Eusebius wrote in the fourth century. However, several academics are unsure whether the gospel descibed by Papias was the same now attributed to Matthew.
Although the Church Fathers of the second century stated that Matthew's Gospel was written in Hebrew by Matthew himself, modern scholars agree that it was most likely written in Greek, and not by an eyewitness to the events described. Furthermore,
and Luke's Gospel, it soon becomes apparent that
Both Matthew and Luke seem to have been substantially based on Mark's Gospel.
