#1 is 13. 549
#2 is 400,000+30,000+5,000+600+40+7
Perimeter of a rectangle:
P=2I+2W=2(I+w)
But if the length and width of a rectangle are both double, then we would have:
Length=2I
width=2w
Therefore, its perimeter would be:
P=2(2I+2w)=4(I+w)
the old perimeter was P=2(I+w) and the new perimeter is P=4(I+w)=2[2(l+w)]
There the perimeter is twice as great.
Answer: C) the perimeter is twice as great.
Answer:
reflection and translation
Expanded Exponential Form:
<span><span>3 × </span></span>
<span><span>+<span>3 × </span></span></span>
<span><span>+<span>7 × </span></span></span>
<span><span>+<span>0 × 1</span></span></span>
<span><span>+<span>6 × </span></span></span>
<span><span>+<span>0 × </span></span></span>
<span><span><span><span>
Add as Brainliest answer when you get the chance to :)
</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
I think it's the last one D
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not 100% sure, but I think the x can't repeat and 4 is the only number of x that hasn't been plotted yet. Tell me if it was right?
