Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
The occupation that it referring to is : skilled and unskilled miners
This treaty was enacted in 1880 , back then the job as a miners is pretty much the equivalent of today's engineer in the term of hotness and availability.
Hope this helps
Answer:a) Disclose less about themselves
Explanation:People for East Asia are more private as compared to people from the west most things are considered very sensitive matters that can not be shared publicly .
Mostly some of the things that people from the west may speak about freely are considered sacred issues in the East or disclosing them may be considered to be disrespectful to the culture.
The principle that prevents the disclosure of information to unauthorized people, resources, and processes is the security principle of confidentiality.
<h3>What is resources?</h3>
Resource refers to the sources or the material that are god gifted and naturally present in the environment which is economically viable, technologically accessible, and culturally sustainable and that enables us to meet our needs and desires.
The confidentiality principle is meant to ensure that personal information remains private, and it can be seen by the only this information who needs it to complete their job roles.
Therefore, it can be concluded that The security concept of confidentiality prohibits the leakage of information to unauthorized individuals, resources, and procedures.
Learn more about resources here:
brainly.com/question/18448459
#SPJ4
The correct answer is 100 to 750 milliseconds
The common understanding of consciousness is more related to psychology, which understands it as an perception of external phenomena and mental states and processes carried out by an organism. It is the state in which one is conscious, that is, awake and attentive to what happens, and not sleeping or passed out.
