Answer:
D. she blamed his fall on his being clumsy
Explanation:
Fundamental attribution error is a term in social psychology which describes how individual, judges people's actions, by giving too much causal weight to the character of people involved, rather than to the circumstances in which those people acted.
It is often known as correspondence bias or attribution effect.
In other words, it is the defined as the tendency for individual to put much emphasis on dispositional and personality-based explanations on actions of people, while putting less empahsis on situational explanations for actions obeserved from the people's behavior or action.
Hence, in this case, Leila is blaming the man's fall on being clumsy, rather than acknowledging the fact that his fall is due to walking on a patch of ice.
1: b)A businessman that stole millions of dollars from his clients
2: c)felony
3: c)Arresting a suspect without reading their Miranda rights
4: c)An employee steals products from their employer.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. ... The Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and such number of Associate Justices as may be fixed by Congress.
The flaw that is shown in the local newspaper article on the herbal supplement has the flaw of B. Correlational data used to suggest causation.
<h3>Why does correlation not equate to causation?</h3>
Correlation is not the same as causation and this means that just because two variables are occurring at the same time does not mean that one variable is causing the other. There could be extenuating circumstances involved.
In this case, there is no evidence that the herbal supplement is the reason why those who take it have less fatigue. There might be other factors such as those people take generally healthy food in general.
Find out more on correlation and causation at brainly.com/question/12479370
#SPJ1
