In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
He is Pope Gregory VII. He is one of the colossal transforming popes, he is maybe best known for the part he played in the Investiture Controversy, his question with Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor that confirmed the power of ecclesiastical expert and the new ordinance law representing the race of the pope by the College of Cardinals
Answer:
it is cellular respiration and auto and factory emissions
Explanation:
just took the test on usa test prep lol
Each of us live out answers to Socrates’ essential question by making conscious, deliberate choices that reflect a view of what matters based from the textbooks.
The Socratic questioning promotes critical thinking among its participants by drawing out concepts in a meaningful discourse. This also enlightens its participants and advocates cooperation. Socratic questions are made by inspiring creativity and analyzing and focusing on a particular problem.
