<span>x 2 3 4
f(x) 5.5 7 8.5 </span>
The first function is linear. When you subtract 5.5 from 7, you get 1.5 and when you subtract 7 from 8.5 you also get 1.5. That's how we know it's a linear function because there's clearly pattern. HOWEVER, if you had 5.5, 7, and 9 that would not be a linear function. Why? Because when you take away 7 from 9 you get 2. In order for it to be a linear function you have to get the same exact number when you subtract.
<span>x 0 3 6
f(x) 1 8 64</span>
The second function is exponential because when you divide you get the exact same number. 8/1 = 8 and 64/8 = 8. So this is exponential. But if you had 72 instead of 64 it would not be an exponential function because there has to be a pattern.
I hope this makes sense. Btw I had this question on my test too and this is correct.
Answer:
x=5
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use proportions to solve this problem. Put the side of the small triangle over the side of the large triangle.
9 15
------ = ----------
2x-1 3x
Using cross products
9*3x = 15(2x-1)
27x = 30x-15
Subtract 30x from each side
27x-30x = 30x-30x -15
-3x = -15
Divide by -3
-3x/-3 = -15x/-3
x = 5
Answer:
Dont know
Step-by-step explanation:
I dont know Archer's equation but the answer for Jenna equatiok is x=10
Answer:43 teaches
Step-by-step explanation:I research it
Answer:DN
Step-by-step explanation:
