Answer:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
And the model obtained for this case is:

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Answer:
160/196
Step-by-step explanation:
it would be easier if you converted all fractions to improper fractions
so 3 1/5 would equal 16/5 and 2 4/5 would equal to 14/5
: to solve this you would need the same common denomenator,
to do this you can multiply 5 and 3 by something to make the lowest common denominator, which would be 15
thus
multiplying first fraction by 3 and the second by 5
42/15 - 10/15 = 32/15
now 32/15 divided by 14/5
the rule for dividing fractions, is flipping the fraction which you will be using to divide, and then multiplying it to the first fraction:
multiplied by 
thus, answer is 160/196
Answer: I think the term is “Like Terms”
Answer: n= number of books
n+5=?
Step-by-step explanation: