Based on fossilized evidence, there are scientific claims made about the evolution of certain species. If a scientist studying t
he fossils of a specific species had a hypothesis other than what was currently accepted, what steps should be taken to have the alternative hypothesis considered
Answer: For the scientist to have alternative hypothesis considered, it is imperative he takes certain steps, this steps will ascertain the scientific claims already made about the evolution of species.
Therefore,the scientist will simply test the alternative hypotheses inorder to know that they are incorrect.
This testing of hypotheses to ascertain their incorrectness is very useful in the study of fossils.
Microscopic organisms contain peptidoglycan in the cell divider.
Archaea do not.Explain the explanation that the <em>two kinds, microbes and archaea</em>, have a similar essential structures, yet worked from various synthetic parts.
The archaea and two microbes have cell films and the two of them contain a hydrophobic bit.
The two microorganisms and archaea have a cell divider that ensures them. it is made out of peptidoglycan, though on account of archaea.
The two microscopic organisms and archaea have diverse Ribosomal RNAs (rRNA).
Archea have three RNA polymerases like eukaryotes, yet microorganisms have just one. Archaea have cell dividers that need peptidoglycan and have films that encase lipids with hydrocarbons as opposed to unsaturated fats.
The two microscopic organisms and archaea have diverse Ribosomal RNAs (rRNA).
Based on that scenario, a faulty reasoning that the student's research advisor most likely point out is : The rock that makes up the fossils replaced the organisms tissue and genetic material,
Because of this , their genomes can't be extracted.
