All categories

3 years ago

Can some one plz help me?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Anna11 [10]3 years ago

4 0

You are multiplying the numbers by 8 so it would most likely be patrick

You might be interested in

What is the y-intercept of the line shown below? A:3/4 B:2 C:3 D:4

olya-2409 [2.1K]

The y-intercept is the y value where the blue line crosses the Y axis which is the vertical black line.

The line crosses at the number 4, so the y-intercept is 4

Answer: D. 4

5 0

2 years ago

A triangle has a 90° angle. What type of triangle is it?

gavmur [86]

A right triangle has one angle equal to 90 degrees. A right triangle can also be an isosceles triangle--which means that it has two sides that are equal. A right isosceles triangle has a 90-degree angle and two 45-degree angles. This is the only right triangle that is an isosceles triangle. But the answer is right triangle

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use the Chain Rule (Calculus 2)

atroni [7]

1. By the chain rule,

$\dfrac{\mathrm dz}{\mathrm dt}=\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x}\dfrac{\mathrm dx}{\mathrm dt}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y}\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dt}$

I'm going to switch up the notation to save space, so for example, $z_x$ is shorthand for $\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}$ .

$z_t=z_xx_t+z_yy_t$

We have

$x=e^{-t}\implies x_t=-e^{-t}$

$y=e^t\implies y_t=e^t$

$z=\tan(xy)\implies\begin{cases}z_x=y\sec^2(xy)=e^t\sec^2(1)\\z_y=x\sec^2(xy)=e^{-t}\sec^2(1)\end{cases}$

$\implies z_t=e^t\sec^2(1)(-e^{-t})+e^{-t}\sec^2(1)e^t=0$

Similarly,

$w_t=w_xx_t+w_yy_t+w_zz_t$

where

$x=\cosh^2t\implies x_t=2\cosh t\sinh t$

$y=\sinh^2t\implies y_t=2\cosh t\sinh t$

$z=t\implies z_t=1$

To capture all the partial derivatives of $w$ , compute its gradient:

$\nabla w=\langle w_x,w_y,w_z\rangle=\dfrac{\langle1,-1,1\rangle}{\sqrt{1-(x-y+z)^2}}}=\dfrac{\langle1,-1,1\rangle}{\sqrt{-2t-t^2}}$

$\implies w_t=\dfrac1{\sqrt{-2t-t^2}}$

2. The problem is asking for $\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}$ . But $z$ is already a function of $x,y$ , so the chain rule isn't needed here. I suspect it's supposed to say "find $\frac{\partial z}{\partial s}$ and $\frac{\partial z}{\partial t}$ " instead.