One of the most effective deterrents to abuses of privacy by social media companies is fear of the public’s backlash and outrage.
Abuse of privacy via this social media range from impersonation of a person else identity, hacking of human beings account that could ends in the robbery of important informations by the owner. Abuse of privateness via social media groups could be very rampant this days and it is very incorrect as it reasons greater harm than desirable.
It have to be cited that one of the manner to lower this is for the social media groups to be served deterrents, if you want to discourage them from this act, inclusive of fear of the general public’s backlash and outrage.
The fear of backlash happens when humans in counter-stereotypical roles are aware that there will be backlash going against them.
Learn more about Blacklash and outrage here:-
brainly.com/question/17328362
#SPJ4
Answer:
Tendency to engage in charity is strongest for religious individuals were religious behavior is a matter of personal choice.
Explanation:
A religious individual
This is often refered to as someone who tries in every possible way to live his or her life in accordance with his or her faith. Those who regularly engages in religious activities is termed "religious".
Religion
This is often known as an organized and collective belief or faith system.
Intrinsic religiosity
This kind of religiosity deals with the fact that it is an individual's primary motive in life and it is the driving force in their life while Extrinsic religiosity is religiosity motivated by external, non-religious rewards.
Helping is the act of rendering assistance to fellow human being especially those of the same faith.
Religion is not enforced but mostly a matter of personal choice. One can decide to be in it or not. Religious people most times are actively involved in charity so as to render help,draw people to their faith or make the world a better place.
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
Answer: c.570 - 622
Please mark me brainliest if i helped
