All categories

3 years ago

The area of a square is numerically 45 more than the perimeter. find the length of the side

1 answer:

4 0

Area of square = l²
Perimeter of square = 4l

According to the question,
$l^2 = 45 + 4l \\\\ l^2 - 4l - 45 = 0 \\\\ l^2 -9l+5l-45=0 \\\\ l(l-9)+5(l-9) =0 \\\\(l-9)(l+5)=0$

Using zero product property,

Either,
$l-9 = 0 \\
~~~~~~l = 9$

Or,
$l+5=0 \\
~~~~~~l=-5$

Since length can't be negative, the length is 9

You might be interested in

Stanley says, "If a point is not on a line, then the line and the point exist on exactly one plane." If the point IS on the line

VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

If the point IS on the line, <u>then the point and the line exist on an infinite number of planes.</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

If the point IS on the line, <u>then the point and the line exist on an infinite number of planes.</u>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In which quadrant, if any, is the point (0, - 4.5) ?

Hoochie [10]

It is on the y axis below the x axis. So it’s in between quadrant 3 and 4. It’s not in a specific quadrant, so the answer would be none. I hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago

Kyle has $1,000 in cash received for high school graduation gifts from various relatives. He wants to invest it in a certificate

Pavel [41]

Answer:

the amount have in five years is $1,338

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation of the amount have in five years is shown below

As we know that

Future value = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years

= $1,000 × (1 + 0.06)^5

= $1,000 × 1.06^5

= $1,338

Hence, the amount have in five years is $1,338

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered

4 0

3 years ago

Examination of a large sample of people revealed a relationship between calcium intake and blood pressure. The relationship was

Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

a) The 95% confidence interval for the mean is (-1.171, 11.717).

b) No, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that increasing the amount of calcium in our diet reduce blood pressure (at a 5% significance level).

Step-by-step explanation:

The data for both groups are:

Group 1 (calcium): 7 -4 18 17 -3 -5 1 10 11 -2

Group 2 (placebo): -1 12 -1 -3 3 -5 5 2 -11 -1 -3

The mean and standard deviation for Group 1 is:

$M_1=\dfrac{1}{10}\sum_{i=1}^{10}(7+(-4)+18+17+(-3)+(-5)+1+10+11+(-2))\\\\\\ M_1=\dfrac{50}{10}=5$

$s_1=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{(n-1)}\sum_{i=1}^{10}(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\$

$s_1=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{9}\cdot [(7-(5))^2+(-4-(5))^2+...+(-2-(5))^2]}\\\\\\$

$s_1=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{9}\cdot [(4)+(81)+(169)+(144)+(64)+(100)+(16)+(25)+(36)+(49)]}\\\\\\s_1=\sqrt{\dfrac{688}{9}}=\sqrt{76.44}\\\\\\s_1=8.743$

The mean and standard deviation for Group 2 is:

$M_2=\dfrac{1}{11}\sum_{i=1}^{11}((-1)+12+(-1)+(-3)+3+(-5)+5+2+(-11)+(-1)+(-3))\\\\\\ M_2=\dfrac{-3}{11}=-0.273$

$s_2=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{(n-1)}\sum_{i=1}^{11}(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\$

$s_2=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{10}\cdot [(-1-(-0.273))^2+(12-(-0.273))^2+...+(-3-(-0.273))^2]}\\\\\\$

$s_2=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{10}\cdot [(0.53)+(150.62)+...+(115.07)+(0.53)+(7.44)]}\\\\\\s_2=\sqrt{\dfrac{348.182}{10}}=\sqrt{34.82}\\\\\\s_2=5.901$

a) We have to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference between means, with a T-model.

The Group 1, of size n1=10 has a mean of 5 and a standard deviation of 8.743.

The Group 2, of size n2=11 has a mean of -0.273 and a standard deviation of 5.901.

The difference between sample means is Md=5.273.

$M_d=M_1-M_2=5-(-0.273)=5.273$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{8.743^2}{10}+\dfrac{5.901^2}{11}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{7.644+3.166}=\sqrt{10.81}=3.288$

The degrees of freedom for this test are:

$df=n_1+n_2-1=10+11-2=19$

The critical t-value for a 95% confidence interval and 19 degrees of freedom is t=1.96.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

$MOE=t\cdot s_{M_d}=1.96 \cdot 3.288=6.444$

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

$LL=M_d-t \cdot s_{M_d} = 5.273-6.444=-1.171\\\\UL=M_d+t \cdot s_{M_d} = 5.273+6.444=11.717$

The 95% confidence interval for the mean is (-1.171, 11.717).

b) This is a hypothesis test for the difference between populations means.

The claim is that increasing the amount of calcium in our diet reduce blood pressure.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a:\mu_1-\mu_2> 0

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=10 has a mean of 5 and a standard deviation of 8.743.

The sample 1, of size n1=11 has a mean of -0.273 and a standard deviation of 5.901.

The difference between sample means is Md=5.273.

$M_d=M_1-M_2=5-(-0.273)=5.273$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{8.743^2}{10}+\dfrac{5.901^2}{11}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{7.644+3.166}=\sqrt{10.81}=3.288$

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

$t=\dfrac{M_d-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_{M_d}}=\dfrac{5.273-0}{3.288}=\dfrac{5.273}{3.288}=1.604$

The degrees of freedom for this test are:

$df=n_1+n_2-1=10+11-2=19$

This test is a right-tailed test, with 19 degrees of freedom and t=1.604, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

$P-value=P(t>1.604)=0.063$

As the P-value (0.063) is bigger than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that increasing the amount of calcium in our diet reduce blood pressure.

4 0

3 years ago

An equation of the line tangent to the graph of f(x)= (4x^2-8x+3)^4 at the point where x=1 is:

stepladder [879]

The answer would be the letter D

6 0

3 years ago