The tensions between the French speaking,Catholic descendants of French colonists and the English speaking,Protestant British population and government.
Ideas that the USA was planning any invasion of Canada in 1865 or just after are nonsense - Britain had sold far more war materiel to the Union than the Confederacy during the Civil War,the Union army was needed to enforce Reconstruction on US citizens in the South,and any war with Britain would have seen the huge British navy establish a blockade of the US coast and cripple the US economy - as it had done in the War of !812.President Johnson was aware of all of this,so had no intention - or desire to - attack Canada.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The next step that Vanessa would have to take is to sign a DoD Statement of Understanding and provide it to her APC.
Explanation:
- Every single event in the programs run by the Department of Defense of the United States is intelligently planned and capable of carrying out required verification at every single stage of the program.
- In the given example, the agency program coordinator requires Vanessa to sign and submit with him the statement issued by the Department of Defense before letting Vanessa have her travel card.
- The submission of the signed statement with the APC thus formulates the last step of the procedure of securing a travel card issued by the DoD.
Answer:
When there are conflicting decisions on the same issue by different court of appeals and when there is a rulling based on racial discrimination.
Explanation:
A writ of certiorari is simply an order a higher court such as the Supreme Court gives for them to evaluate the decisions and processes in a lower court. This enables the higher court to ascertain if there are wrongdoings in the process. Cases have been brought to the U.S Supreme Court on a regular basis through this method and they have granted only about 1.1% of over a thousand cases.
Writ of certiorari can be issued when a court of appeals in the U.S has made a decision in court which is conflicting with the decision made by another court of appeals in the same country, on the same issue. The losing party in both scenarios here can appeal to the Supreme Court.
Also, where there is an appeal court ruling that does not favor a citizen on a basis of racial discrimination with no precedent, the decision can be appealed. Similar incident happened in the case by Ricky Brown, Raishawn Morris, Charles Battiste against the City of Oneonta, New work in which it was alleged that the enforcement officials carried their tasks while targeting minority members of the area for interrogation based on race.
Answer:
the moral and ethical principles traditionally upheld and passed on within a family, as fidelty, honesty, truth, and faith." "values especially of a traditional or conservative kind which are held to promote the sound functioning of the family and to strengthen the fabric of society."By promoting the values of social responsibility, solidarity, and social utility, social ethics stands as the fulcrum of a rational, moral, egalitarian, pluralistic, democratic society rising on the pillars of human rights and human dignity.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The two words that would best replace “fundamental” and “impressive" in the selections above would be central and wondrous.
Option: (D)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The idea of the fundamentality of the systems of transportation of goods and human beings presented here can be referred to as of prime importance around which most other factors of the economy revolve. Hence, the word fundamental can be replaced by 'central'.
- The fact how impressively the new and improved technologies work and contribute to economic growth would simply make anyone wonder about the efficiency of technology. Hence, the world impressive can be replaced by 'wondrous'.
